Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.8
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:30
on 2026/03/23 14:30
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:57
on 2026/03/23 13:57
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -24,25 +24,17 @@ 24 24 25 25 26 26 **4. Scenario / Context** 27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 27 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs] 28 + 28 28 29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 - 31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 - 37 - 38 38 **5. Participants** 39 39 40 -* FR team ROBOT:32 +* FR team 1: 41 41 ** 1x Squad leaders 42 42 ** 1x Robot operator 43 43 ** 1x Robot analyst 44 44 ** 2x First responder 45 -* FR team HUMAN:37 +* FR team 2: 46 46 ** 1x Squad leaders 47 47 ** 2x First reponder 48 48 * Base of Operations: ... ... @@ -54,35 +54,11 @@ 54 54 55 55 **6. System(s) Under Test** 56 56 57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 -* NO autonomy. 65 -))) 66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 -))) 71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 -))) 77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 -))) 49 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)] 50 +* Version / configuration: [Describe] 51 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview] 52 + 83 83 84 - 85 - 86 86 **7. Tasks** 87 87 88 88 [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] ... ... @@ -91,53 +91,22 @@ 91 91 92 92 93 93 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 62 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 94 94 95 -Two buildings: 96 96 97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 99 - 100 -Trial 1: 101 - 102 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A 103 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B 104 - 105 -Trial 2: 106 - 107 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B 108 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A 109 - 110 - 111 111 **9. Measurements** 112 112 113 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 67 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] 68 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 69 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 114 114 115 115 116 116 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 117 117 118 -1. Preparation: 119 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 120 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 121 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 122 -1. Briefing: 123 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 124 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 125 -1. Execution: 126 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 127 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 128 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: 129 -111. Mission completion time 130 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 131 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts 132 -111. Track FR path 133 -1. Hotwash: 134 -11. Questions on: 135 -111. Near-incident report 136 -111. Path inside 137 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 138 -111. Mission effectiveness 139 -111. Self-reported workload 140 -111. Trust survey 74 +1. [Describe preparation] 75 +1. [Briefing] 76 +1. [Execution] 77 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 141 141 142 142 143 143 **~11. Materials / Setup Components**