Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:57
on 2026/03/23 13:57
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.8
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:30
on 2026/03/23 14:30
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -24,17 +24,25 @@ 24 24 25 25 26 26 **4. Scenario / Context** 27 -[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs] 28 - 27 +ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 29 29 29 +Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 + 31 +* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 +* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 +* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 +** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 +** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 + 37 + 30 30 **5. Participants** 31 31 32 -* FR team 1:40 +* FR team ROBOT: 33 33 ** 1x Squad leaders 34 34 ** 1x Robot operator 35 35 ** 1x Robot analyst 36 36 ** 2x First responder 37 -* FR team 2:45 +* FR team HUMAN: 38 38 ** 1x Squad leaders 39 39 ** 2x First reponder 40 40 * Base of Operations: ... ... @@ -46,11 +46,35 @@ 46 46 47 47 **6. System(s) Under Test** 48 48 49 -* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)] 50 -* Version / configuration: [Describe] 51 -* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview] 52 - 57 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 +|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 +* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 +* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 +* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 +* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 +* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 +* NO autonomy. 65 +))) 66 +|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 +* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 +* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 +* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 +))) 71 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 +* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 +* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 +* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 +* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 +))) 77 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 +* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 +* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 +* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 +* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 +))) 53 53 84 + 85 + 54 54 **7. Tasks** 55 55 56 56 [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] ... ... @@ -59,22 +59,53 @@ 59 59 60 60 61 61 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 62 -[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 63 63 95 +Two buildings: 64 64 97 +* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 98 +* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 99 + 100 +Trial 1: 101 + 102 +* FR Team ROBOT does Building A 103 +* FR team HUMAN does Building B 104 + 105 +Trial 2: 106 + 107 +* FR Team ROBOT does Building B 108 +* FR team HUMAN does Building A 109 + 110 + 65 65 **9. Measurements** 66 66 67 -* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] 68 -* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 69 -* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 113 +See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 70 70 71 71 72 72 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 73 73 74 -1. [Describe preparation] 75 -1. [Briefing] 76 -1. [Execution] 77 -1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 118 +1. Preparation: 119 +11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 120 +11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 121 +11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 122 +1. Briefing: 123 +11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 124 +11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 125 +1. Execution: 126 +11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 127 +11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 128 +11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: 129 +111. Mission completion time 130 +111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 131 +111. Time for tackling any health alerts 132 +111. Track FR path 133 +1. Hotwash: 134 +11. Questions on: 135 +111. Near-incident report 136 +111. Path inside 137 +111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 138 +111. Mission effectiveness 139 +111. Self-reported workload 140 +111. Trust survey 78 78 79 79 80 80 **~11. Materials / Setup Components**