Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.18
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/24 09:19
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
1 +h. Test SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1 1  **Experiment title**
2 -System baseline test
2 +[Short, descriptive title]
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 8  1. Mission effectiveness
9 9  1. Mission efficiency
... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
10 10  1. FR Health
11 11  1. FR and victim safety
12 12  
13 +
13 13  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 14  See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15 15  
... ... @@ -21,25 +21,19 @@
21 21  * CL06: improved FR health
22 22  * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23 23  
25 +
24 24  **4. Scenario / Context**
25 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
27 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs]
28 +
26 26  
27 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
28 -
29 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
30 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
31 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
32 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34 -
35 35  **5. Participants**
36 36  
37 -* FR team ROBOT:
32 +* FR team 1:
38 38  ** 1x Squad leaders
39 39  ** 1x Robot operator
40 40  ** 1x Robot analyst
41 41  ** 2x First responder
42 -* FR team HUMAN:
37 +* FR team 2:
43 43  ** 1x Squad leaders
44 44  ** 2x First reponder
45 45  * Base of Operations:
... ... @@ -51,35 +51,11 @@
51 51  
52 52  **6. System(s) Under Test**
53 53  
54 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
55 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
56 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
57 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
58 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
59 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
60 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
61 -* NO autonomy.
62 -)))
63 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
64 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
65 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
66 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
67 -)))
68 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
69 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
70 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
71 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
72 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
73 -)))
74 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
75 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
76 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
77 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
78 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
79 -)))
49 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)]
50 +* Version / configuration: [Describe]
51 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview]
52 +
80 80  
81 -
82 -
83 83  **7. Tasks**
84 84  
85 85  [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
... ... @@ -88,105 +88,48 @@
88 88  
89 89  
90 90  **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
62 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
91 91  
92 -Two buildings:
93 93  
94 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
95 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
65 +**9. Measurements**
96 96  
97 -Trial 1:
67 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
68 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
69 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
98 98  
99 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
100 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
101 101  
102 -Trial 2:
72 +**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
103 103  
104 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
74 +1. [Describe preparation]
75 +1. [Briefing]
76 +1. [Execution]
77 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
106 106  
107 -**9. Measurements**
108 108  
109 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
80 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
81 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
110 110  
111 111  
112 -**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
84 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
113 113  
114 -1. __Team preparation__:
115 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
116 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
117 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
118 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
119 -1. __Experiment preparation:__
120 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
121 -1. __Briefing:__
122 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
123 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
124 -1. __Execution:__
125 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
126 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
127 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
128 -111. Mission completion time
129 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
130 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
131 -111. Track FR path
132 -1. __Hotwash__:
133 -11. Questions on:
134 -111. Near-incident report
135 -111. Path inside
136 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
137 -111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness?
138 -111. Self-reported workload
139 -111. Trust survey
140 -11. Group discussion with feedback
86 +* Risks: [Describe]
87 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
88 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
89 +* Data handling: [Describe]
141 141  
142 -**~11. Planning:**
143 143  
144 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
145 -* Trial 1:
146 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
147 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
148 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
149 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
150 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
151 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
152 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
153 -* Trial 2: 
154 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
155 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
156 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
157 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
158 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
159 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
92 +**13. Location & Duration**
160 160  
94 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
95 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
161 161  
162 162  
163 -**12. Materials**
98 +**14. Dependencies**
99 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
164 164  
165 -* For FRs:
166 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
167 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
168 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
169 -** 4x Health sensors
170 -** 4x Location sensors
171 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
172 -* For usecase:
173 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
174 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
175 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
176 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
177 177  
178 -**13. Dependencies**
102 +**15. Success Criteria**
103 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
179 179  
180 -* Availability of materials
181 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
182 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
183 -* Availability of:
184 -** Experiment participants
185 -** People willing to play victim
186 -** Experiment leaders
187 187  
188 -**14. Success Criteria**
189 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
190 -
191 -
192 192