Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.14
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:57
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 8  1. Mission effectiveness
9 9  1. Mission efficiency
... ... @@ -24,25 +24,17 @@
24 24  
25 25  
26 26  **4. Scenario / Context**
27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
27 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs]
28 +
28 28  
29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
30 -
31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
36 -
37 -
38 38  **5. Participants**
39 39  
40 -* FR team ROBOT:
32 +* FR team 1:
41 41  ** 1x Squad leaders
42 42  ** 1x Robot operator
43 43  ** 1x Robot analyst
44 44  ** 2x First responder
45 -* FR team HUMAN:
37 +* FR team 2:
46 46  ** 1x Squad leaders
47 47  ** 2x First reponder
48 48  * Base of Operations:
... ... @@ -54,35 +54,11 @@
54 54  
55 55  **6. System(s) Under Test**
56 56  
57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
64 -* NO autonomy.
65 -)))
66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
70 -)))
71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
76 -)))
77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
82 -)))
49 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)]
50 +* Version / configuration: [Describe]
51 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview]
52 +
83 83  
84 -
85 -
86 86  **7. Tasks**
87 87  
88 88  [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
... ... @@ -91,108 +91,48 @@
91 91  
92 92  
93 93  **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
62 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
94 94  
95 -Two buildings:
96 96  
97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
99 -*
100 -
101 -Trial 1:
102 -
103 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
104 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
105 -
106 -Trial 2:
107 -
108 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
109 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
110 -
111 -
112 112  **9. Measurements**
113 113  
114 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
67 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
68 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
69 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
115 115  
116 116  
117 117  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
118 118  
119 -1. Team preparation:
120 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
121 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
122 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
123 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
124 -1. Experiment preparation
125 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
126 -1. Briefing:
127 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
128 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
129 -1. Execution:
130 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
131 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
132 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
133 -111. Mission completion time
134 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
135 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
136 -111. Track FR path
137 -1. Hotwash:
138 -11. Questions on:
139 -111. Near-incident report
140 -111. Path inside
141 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
142 -111. Mission effectiveness
143 -111. Self-reported workload
144 -111. Trust survey
74 +1. [Describe preparation]
75 +1. [Briefing]
76 +1. [Execution]
77 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
145 145  
146 -Planning:
147 147  
148 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
149 -* Trial 1:
150 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
151 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
152 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
153 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
154 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
155 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
156 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
157 -* Trial 2: 
158 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
159 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
160 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
161 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
162 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
163 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
80 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
81 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
164 164  
165 165  
84 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
166 166  
167 -**~11. Materials**
86 +* Risks: [Describe]
87 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
88 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
89 +* Data handling: [Describe]
168 168  
169 -* For FRs:
170 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
171 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
172 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
173 -** 4x Health sensors
174 -** 4x Location sensors
175 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
176 -* For usecase:
177 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
178 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
179 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
180 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
181 181  
92 +**13. Location & Duration**
182 182  
183 -**14. Dependencies**
94 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
95 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
184 184  
185 -* Availability of materials
186 -* Availaibility and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
187 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
188 -* Availability of:
189 -** Experiment participants
190 -** People willing to play victim
191 -** Experiment leaders
192 192  
98 +**14. Dependencies**
99 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
193 193  
101 +
194 194  **15. Success Criteria**
195 -When mission completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance.
103 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
196 196  
197 197  
198 198