Wiki source code of h. Test SFT1
Version 1.7 by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/23 14:15
Hide last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| |
1.6 | 1 | **Experiment title** |
| |
1.2 | 2 | [Short, descriptive title] |
| 3 | |||
| |
1.6 | 4 | |
| |
1.2 | 5 | **2. Objective / Research Question** |
| |
1.6 | 6 | Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? |
| |
1.2 | 7 | |
| |
1.6 | 8 | 1. Mission effectiveness |
| 9 | 1. Mission efficiency | ||
| 10 | 1. FR Health | ||
| 11 | 1. FR and victim safety | ||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| |
1.2 | 14 | **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** |
| |
1.6 | 15 | See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: |
| |
1.2 | 16 | |
| |
1.6 | 17 | * CL01: Improve safety for responders |
| 18 | * CL02: Increased SA | ||
| 19 | * CL03: Improved mission effectiveness | ||
| 20 | * CL04: acceptable workload | ||
| 21 | * CL05: trustworthy SA | ||
| 22 | * CL06: improved FR health | ||
| 23 | * CL07: degraded mission efficiency | ||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| |
1.2 | 26 | **4. Scenario / Context** |
| |
1.7 | 27 | ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration |
| |
1.2 | 28 | |
| |
1.7 | 29 | Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : |
| 30 | |||
| 31 | * Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. | ||
| 32 | * **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. | ||
| 33 | * Specific to scenario with ANYmal: | ||
| 34 | ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). | ||
| 35 | ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | |||
| |
1.2 | 38 | **5. Participants** |
| 39 | |||
| |
1.7 | 40 | * FR team ROBOT: |
| |
1.3 | 41 | ** 1x Squad leaders |
| 42 | ** 1x Robot operator | ||
| 43 | ** 1x Robot analyst | ||
| 44 | ** 2x First responder | ||
| |
1.7 | 45 | * FR team HUMAN: |
| |
1.3 | 46 | ** 1x Squad leaders |
| 47 | ** 2x First reponder | ||
| 48 | * Base of Operations: | ||
| |
1.6 | 49 | ** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist |
| |
1.3 | 50 | ** Team lead |
| |
1.2 | 51 | |
| |
1.6 | 52 | Number of participants: 9 |
| 53 | |||
| |
1.5 | 54 | |
| |
1.2 | 55 | **6. System(s) Under Test** |
| 56 | |||
| |
1.7 | 57 | |(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description |
| 58 | |(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( | ||
| 59 | * Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). | ||
| 60 | * Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) | ||
| 61 | * Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. | ||
| 62 | * Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. | ||
| 63 | * Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. | ||
| 64 | * NO autonomy. | ||
| 65 | ))) | ||
| 66 | |(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( | ||
| 67 | * Interoperability with health and location sensors. | ||
| 68 | * Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). | ||
| 69 | * Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). | ||
| 70 | ))) | ||
| 71 | |(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( | ||
| 72 | * Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). | ||
| 73 | * Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. | ||
| 74 | * Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. | ||
| 75 | * Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. | ||
| 76 | ))) | ||
| 77 | |(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( | ||
| 78 | * Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. | ||
| 79 | * Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. | ||
| 80 | * Integration with C3I and mapping systems. | ||
| 81 | * Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). | ||
| 82 | ))) | ||
| |
1.2 | 83 | |
| |
1.7 | 84 | |
| 85 | |||
| |
1.2 | 86 | **7. Tasks** |
| 87 | |||
| |
1.6 | 88 | [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] |
| 89 | |||
| 90 | [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] | ||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | |||
| |
1.2 | 93 | **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** |
| |
1.7 | 94 | |
| 95 | Two buildings: | ||
| 96 | |||
| 97 | * Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). | ||
| 98 | * Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) | ||
| 99 | |||
| 100 | |||
| 101 | |||
| 102 | Trial1: | ||
| 103 | |||
| 104 | * FR Team ROBOT does easy | ||
| 105 | |||
| 106 | Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] | ||
| 107 | |||
| |
1.2 | 108 | [Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] |
| 109 | |||
| |
1.6 | 110 | |
| |
1.2 | 111 | **9. Measurements** |
| 112 | |||
| 113 | * Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] | ||
| 114 | * Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] | ||
| 115 | * Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] | ||
| 116 | |||
| |
1.6 | 117 | |
| |
1.2 | 118 | **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** |
| 119 | |||
| 120 | 1. [Describe preparation] | ||
| 121 | 1. [Briefing] | ||
| 122 | 1. [Execution] | ||
| 123 | 1. [Debrief / Hotwash] | ||
| 124 | |||
| |
1.6 | 125 | |
| |
1.2 | 126 | **~11. Materials / Setup Components** |
| 127 | [List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] | ||
| 128 | |||
| |
1.6 | 129 | |
| |
1.2 | 130 | **12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** |
| 131 | |||
| 132 | * Risks: [Describe] | ||
| 133 | * Mitigations: [Describe] | ||
| 134 | * Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] | ||
| 135 | * Data handling: [Describe] | ||
| 136 | |||
| |
1.6 | 137 | |
| |
1.2 | 138 | **13. Location & Duration** |
| 139 | |||
| 140 | * Location: [Where does it take place?] | ||
| 141 | * Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] | ||
| 142 | |||
| |
1.6 | 143 | |
| |
1.2 | 144 | **14. Dependencies** |
| 145 | [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] | ||
| 146 | |||
| |
1.6 | 147 | |
| |
1.2 | 148 | **15. Success Criteria** |
| 149 | [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] | ||
| 150 | |||
| 151 | |||
| 152 |