Skip to Content
Version 1.19 by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/24 09:19
Show last authors
1 **Experiment title**
2 System baseline test
3
4
5 **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
7
8 1. Mission effectiveness
9 1. Mission efficiency
10 1. FR Health
11 1. FR and victim safety
12
13 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15
16 * CL01: Improve safety for responders
17 * CL02: Increased SA
18 * CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
19 * CL04: acceptable workload
20 * CL05: trustworthy SA
21 * CL06: improved FR health
22 * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23
24 **4. Scenario / Context**
25 ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
26
27 Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
28
29 * Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
30 * **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
31 * Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
32 ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34
35 **5. Participants**
36
37 * FR team ROBOT:
38 ** 1x Squad leaders
39 ** 1x Robot operator
40 ** 1x Robot analyst
41 ** 2x First responder
42 * FR team HUMAN:
43 ** 1x Squad leaders
44 ** 2x First reponder
45 * Base of Operations:
46 ** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
47 ** Team lead
48
49 Number of participants: 9 
50
51
52 **6. System(s) Under Test**
53
54 |(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
55 |(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
56 * Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
57 * Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
58 * Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
59 * Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
60 * Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
61 * NO autonomy.
62 )))
63 |(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
64 * Interoperability with health and location sensors.
65 * Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
66 * Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
67 )))
68 |(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
69 * Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
70 * Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
71 * Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
72 * Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
73 )))
74 |(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
75 * Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
76 * Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
77 * Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
78 * Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
79 )))
80
81
82
83 **7. Tasks**
84
85 [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
86
87 [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 
88
89
90 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
91
92 Two buildings:
93
94 * Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
95 * Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
96
97 Trial 1:
98
99 * FR Team ROBOT does Building A
100 * FR team HUMAN does Building B
101
102 Trial 2:
103
104 * FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 * FR team HUMAN does Building A
106
107 **9. Measurements**
108
109 See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
110
111
112 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
113
114 1. __Team preparation__:
115 11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
116 11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
117 11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
118 11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
119 1. __Experiment preparation:__
120 11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
121 1. __Briefing:__
122 11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
123 11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
124 1. __Execution:__
125 11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
126 11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
127 11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
128 111. Mission completion time
129 111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
130 111. Time for tackling any health alerts
131 111. Track FR path
132 1. __Hotwash__:
133 11. Questions (specified per role) on:
134 111. Near-incident report
135 111. Path inside
136 111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
137 111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness?
138 111. Self-reported workload
139 111. Trust survey
140 11. Group discussion with feedback
141
142 **~11. Planning:**
143
144 * Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
145 * Trial 1:
146 ** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
147 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
148 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
149 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
150 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
151 ** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
152 * Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
153 * Trial 2: 
154 ** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
155 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
156 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
157 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
158 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
159 ** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
160
161
162
163 **12. Materials**
164
165 * For FRs:
166 ** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
167 ** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
168 ** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
169 ** 4x Health sensors
170 ** 4x Location sensors
171 ** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
172 * For usecase:
173 ** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
174 ** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
175 ** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
176 * 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
177
178 **13. Dependencies**
179
180 * Availability of materials
181 * Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
182 * Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
183 * Availability of:
184 ** Experiment participants
185 ** People willing to play victim
186 ** Experiment leaders
187
188 **14. Success Criteria**
189 When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
190
191
192