Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 2.2
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2026/03/24 16:00
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.17
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.RosaVanTuijn
1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije
Content
... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
10 10  1. FR Health
11 11  1. FR and victim safety
12 12  
13 +
13 13  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 14  See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15 15  
... ... @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
21 21  * CL06: improved FR health
22 22  * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23 23  
25 +
24 24  **4. Scenario / Context**
25 25  ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
26 26  
... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
32 32  ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 33  ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34 34  
37 +
35 35  **5. Participants**
36 36  
37 37  * FR team ROBOT:
... ... @@ -104,48 +104,12 @@
104 104  * FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 105  * FR team HUMAN does Building A
106 106  
110 +
107 107  **9. Measurements**
108 108  
109 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]. Compare outcomes between the two conditions teams if applicable.
113 +See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
110 110  
111 -|**Claim: Safety**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test **
112 -|Safer decision before entry|Safe path chosen|(((
113 -* Define ground-truth safe path(s) beforehand so that they can be compared to chosen entry path during the trial
114 -* Score paths beforehand: safe/ suboptimal/ unsafe
115 -)))
116 -|Better decision overall|"How good were you decisions looking back?"|(((
117 -* Hotwash reflection question (likert + open)
118 -* Observations of errors (e.g. near-incidents, unsafe choices)
119 -)))
120 -|Fewer dangerous situations|Near-incident reports|(((
121 -* Define hazards in buildings beforehand and check (with observations of during hotwash) if these hazards are avoided or not
122 -)))
123 123  
124 -|**Claim: Efficiency**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test **
125 -|Faster mission execution|Total mission completion time|(((
126 -* Timestamp of start (after briefing) till all located victims have been extracted
127 -)))
128 -|Faster inside performance|First responder time inside|(((
129 -* Timestamp of entry building till exist building (last located victim is exstracted)
130 -)))
131 -
132 -|**Claim: Situation Awareness**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test **
133 -|Before entry |(((
134 -Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout
135 -)))|(((
136 -
137 -)))
138 -|During entry|(((
139 -FR path logs
140 -)))|(((
141 -
142 -)))
143 -|After mission|(((
144 -Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout
145 -)))|
146 -
147 -
148 -
149 149  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
150 150  
151 151  1. __Team preparation__:
... ... @@ -167,33 +167,32 @@
167 167  111. Time for tackling any health alerts
168 168  111. Track FR path
169 169  1. __Hotwash__:
170 -11. Questions (specified per role, couple questions per topic) on:
137 +11. Questions on:
171 171  111. Near-incident report
172 172  111. Path inside
173 173  111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
174 -111. Mission effectiveness: e.g. self reported effectiveness of decisions
141 +111. Mission effectiveness
175 175  111. Self-reported workload
176 176  111. Trust survey
177 -11. Group discussion with feedback
178 178  
179 179  **~11. Planning:**
180 180  
181 181  * Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
182 182  * Trial 1:
183 -** Setup scenario: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
149 +** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
184 184  ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
185 185  ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
186 186  ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
187 187  ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
188 -** Scenario reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
154 +** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
189 189  * Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
190 190  * Trial 2: 
191 -** (Setup scenario: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00)
157 +** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
192 192  ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
193 193  ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
194 194  ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
195 195  ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
196 -* Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
162 +** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
197 197  
198 198  
199 199  
... ... @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@
212 212  ** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
213 213  * 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
214 214  
181 +
215 215  **13. Dependencies**
216 216  
217 217  * Availability of materials
... ... @@ -222,6 +222,7 @@
222 222  ** People willing to play victim
223 223  ** Experiment leaders
224 224  
192 +
225 225  **14. Success Criteria**
226 226  When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
227 227