Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.8
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:19
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,169 +1,0 @@
1 -**Experiment title**
2 -[Short, descriptive title]
3 -
4 -
5 -**2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 -
8 -1. Mission effectiveness
9 -1. Mission efficiency
10 -1. FR Health
11 -1. FR and victim safety
12 -
13 -
14 -**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
15 -See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
16 -
17 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders
18 -* CL02: Increased SA
19 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
20 -* CL04: acceptable workload
21 -* CL05: trustworthy SA
22 -* CL06: improved FR health
23 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency
24 -
25 -
26 -**4. Scenario / Context**
27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
28 -
29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
30 -
31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
36 -
37 -
38 -**5. Participants**
39 -
40 -* FR team ROBOT:
41 -** 1x Squad leaders
42 -** 1x Robot operator
43 -** 1x Robot analyst
44 -** 2x First responder
45 -* FR team HUMAN:
46 -** 1x Squad leaders
47 -** 2x First reponder
48 -* Base of Operations:
49 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
50 -** Team lead
51 -
52 -Number of participants: 9 
53 -
54 -
55 -**6. System(s) Under Test**
56 -
57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
64 -* NO autonomy.
65 -)))
66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
70 -)))
71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
76 -)))
77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
82 -)))
83 -
84 -
85 -
86 -**7. Tasks**
87 -
88 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
89 -
90 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 
91 -
92 -
93 -**8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
94 -
95 -Two buildings:
96 -
97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
99 -
100 -Trial 1:
101 -
102 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
103 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
104 -
105 -Trial 2:
106 -
107 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
108 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
109 -
110 -
111 -**9. Measurements**
112 -
113 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
114 -
115 -
116 -**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
117 -
118 -1. Preparation:
119 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
120 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
121 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
122 -1. Briefing:
123 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
124 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
125 -1. Execution:
126 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
127 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
128 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
129 -111. Mission completion time
130 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
131 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
132 -111. Track FR path
133 -1. Hotwash:
134 -11. Questions on:
135 -111. Near-incident report
136 -111. Path inside
137 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
138 -111. Mission effectiveness
139 -111. Self-reported workload
140 -111. Trust survey
141 -
142 -
143 -**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
144 -[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
145 -
146 -
147 -**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
148 -
149 -* Risks: [Describe]
150 -* Mitigations: [Describe]
151 -* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
152 -* Data handling: [Describe]
153 -
154 -
155 -**13. Location & Duration**
156 -
157 -* Location: [Where does it take place?]
158 -* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
159 -
160 -
161 -**14. Dependencies**
162 -[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
163 -
164 -
165 -**15. Success Criteria**
166 -[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
167 -
168 -
169 -