Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.5
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:48
on 2026/03/23 13:48
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,113 +1,44 @@ 1 -**Experiment title**1 +**~1. Title of the Experiment** 2 2 [Short, descriptive title] 3 3 4 - 5 5 **2. Objective / Research Question** 6 - Do the SYNERGISEtechnologiestogetherimprovethe belowSYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] withoutnegativeeffects?5 +[What are you trying to learn, test, or compare?] 7 7 8 -1. Mission effectiveness 9 -1. Mission efficiency 10 -1. FR Health 11 -1. FR and victim safety 12 - 13 - 14 14 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 15 - See the claimsfrom[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. UseCases.UC04\.0\: Detailedindoorexploration.UC04\.3\: Detailedindoor explorationwith ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]],being:8 +[If applicable, what do you expect to observe?] 16 16 17 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 -* CL02: Increased SA 19 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 -* CL04: acceptable workload 21 -* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 -* CL06: improved FR health 23 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 - 25 - 26 26 **4. Scenario / Context** 27 - ASR3: Detailedindoor exploration11 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs] 28 28 29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 - 31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 - 37 - 38 38 **5. Participants** 39 39 40 -* FR team ROBOT:15 +* FR team 1: 41 41 ** 1x Squad leaders 42 42 ** 1x Robot operator 43 43 ** 1x Robot analyst 44 44 ** 2x First responder 45 -* FR team HUMAN:20 +* FR team: 46 46 ** 1x Squad leaders 47 47 ** 2x First reponder 48 48 * Base of Operations: 49 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist24 +** 1x Safety officer 50 50 ** Team lead 26 + 51 51 52 -Number of participants: 9 53 - 28 +Number of participants: 9 54 54 55 55 **6. System(s) Under Test** 56 56 57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 -* NO autonomy. 65 -))) 66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 -))) 71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 -))) 77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 -))) 32 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)] 33 +* Version / configuration: [Describe] 34 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview] 83 83 84 - 85 - 86 86 **7. Tasks** 37 +[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence] 87 87 88 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 - 90 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 - 92 - 93 93 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 - 95 -Two buildings: 96 - 97 -* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 -* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 99 - 100 - 101 - 102 -Trial1: 103 - 104 -* FR Team ROBOT does easy 105 - 106 -Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 107 - 108 108 [Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 109 109 110 - 111 111 **9. Measurements** 112 112 113 113 * Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] ... ... @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ 114 114 * Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 115 115 * Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 116 116 117 - 118 118 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 119 119 120 120 1. [Describe preparation] ... ... @@ -122,11 +122,9 @@ 122 122 1. [Execution] 123 123 1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 124 124 125 - 126 126 **~11. Materials / Setup Components** 127 127 [List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 128 128 129 - 130 130 **12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 131 131 132 132 * Risks: [Describe] ... ... @@ -134,17 +134,14 @@ 134 134 * Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 135 135 * Data handling: [Describe] 136 136 137 - 138 138 **13. Location & Duration** 139 139 140 140 * Location: [Where does it take place?] 141 141 * Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 142 142 143 - 144 144 **14. Dependencies** 145 145 [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 146 146 147 - 148 148 **15. Success Criteria** 149 149 [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 150 150