Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:19
on 2026/03/23 13:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,152 +1,0 @@ 1 -**Experiment title** 2 -[Short, descriptive title] 3 - 4 - 5 -**2. Objective / Research Question** 6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 7 - 8 -1. Mission effectiveness 9 -1. Mission efficiency 10 -1. FR Health 11 -1. FR and victim safety 12 - 13 - 14 -**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 15 -See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 16 - 17 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 -* CL02: Increased SA 19 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 -* CL04: acceptable workload 21 -* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 -* CL06: improved FR health 23 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 - 25 - 26 -**4. Scenario / Context** 27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 28 - 29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 - 31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 - 37 - 38 -**5. Participants** 39 - 40 -* FR team ROBOT: 41 -** 1x Squad leaders 42 -** 1x Robot operator 43 -** 1x Robot analyst 44 -** 2x First responder 45 -* FR team HUMAN: 46 -** 1x Squad leaders 47 -** 2x First reponder 48 -* Base of Operations: 49 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist 50 -** Team lead 51 - 52 -Number of participants: 9 53 - 54 - 55 -**6. System(s) Under Test** 56 - 57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 -* NO autonomy. 65 -))) 66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 -))) 71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 -))) 77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 -))) 83 - 84 - 85 - 86 -**7. Tasks** 87 - 88 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 - 90 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 - 92 - 93 -**8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 - 95 -Two buildings: 96 - 97 -* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 -* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 99 - 100 - 101 - 102 -Trial1: 103 - 104 -* FR Team ROBOT does easy 105 - 106 -Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 107 - 108 -[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 109 - 110 - 111 -**9. Measurements** 112 - 113 -* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] 114 -* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 115 -* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 116 - 117 - 118 -**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 119 - 120 -1. [Describe preparation] 121 -1. [Briefing] 122 -1. [Execution] 123 -1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 124 - 125 - 126 -**~11. Materials / Setup Components** 127 -[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 128 - 129 - 130 -**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 131 - 132 -* Risks: [Describe] 133 -* Mitigations: [Describe] 134 -* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 135 -* Data handling: [Describe] 136 - 137 - 138 -**13. Location & Duration** 139 - 140 -* Location: [Where does it take place?] 141 -* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 142 - 143 - 144 -**14. Dependencies** 145 -[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 146 - 147 - 148 -**15. Success Criteria** 149 -[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 150 - 151 - 152 -