Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.5
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:48
on 2026/03/23 13:48
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,44 +1,113 @@ 1 -** ~1. Title of theExperiment**1 +**Experiment title** 2 2 [Short, descriptive title] 3 3 4 + 4 4 **2. Objective / Research Question** 5 - [Whatareyoutrying tolearn,test,orcompare?]6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 6 6 8 +1. Mission effectiveness 9 +1. Mission efficiency 10 +1. FR Health 11 +1. FR and victim safety 12 + 13 + 7 7 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 8 - [If applicable,what doyouexpect toobserve?]15 +See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 9 9 17 +* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 +* CL02: Increased SA 19 +* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 +* CL04: acceptable workload 21 +* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 +* CL06: improved FR health 23 +* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 + 25 + 10 10 **4. Scenario / Context** 11 - [Short description of the operationalor simulatedscenarioin which theexperiment runs]27 +ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 12 12 29 +Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 + 31 +* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 +* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 +* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 +** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 +** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 + 37 + 13 13 **5. Participants** 14 14 15 -* FR team 1:40 +* FR team ROBOT: 16 16 ** 1x Squad leaders 17 17 ** 1x Robot operator 18 18 ** 1x Robot analyst 19 19 ** 2x First responder 20 -* FR team: 45 +* FR team HUMAN: 21 21 ** 1x Squad leaders 22 22 ** 2x First reponder 23 23 * Base of Operations: 24 -** 1x Safety officer 49 +** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist 25 25 ** Team lead 26 - 27 27 28 -Number of participants: 9 52 +Number of participants: 9 53 + 29 29 30 30 **6. System(s) Under Test** 31 31 32 -* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)] 33 -* Version / configuration: [Describe] 34 -* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview] 57 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 +|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 +* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 +* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 +* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 +* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 +* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 +* NO autonomy. 65 +))) 66 +|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 +* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 +* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 +* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 +))) 71 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 +* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 +* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 +* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 +* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 +))) 77 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 +* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 +* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 +* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 +* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 +))) 35 35 84 + 85 + 36 36 **7. Tasks** 37 -[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence] 38 38 88 +[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 + 90 +[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 + 92 + 39 39 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 + 95 +Two buildings: 96 + 97 +* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 +* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 99 + 100 + 101 + 102 +Trial1: 103 + 104 +* FR Team ROBOT does easy 105 + 106 +Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 107 + 40 40 [Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 41 41 110 + 42 42 **9. Measurements** 43 43 44 44 * Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] ... ... @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ 45 45 * Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 46 46 * Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 47 47 117 + 48 48 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 49 49 50 50 1. [Describe preparation] ... ... @@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ 52 52 1. [Execution] 53 53 1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 54 54 125 + 55 55 **~11. Materials / Setup Components** 56 56 [List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 57 57 129 + 58 58 **12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 59 59 60 60 * Risks: [Describe] ... ... @@ -62,14 +62,17 @@ 62 62 * Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 63 63 * Data handling: [Describe] 64 64 137 + 65 65 **13. Location & Duration** 66 66 67 67 * Location: [Where does it take place?] 68 68 * Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 69 69 143 + 70 70 **14. Dependencies** 71 71 [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 72 72 147 + 73 73 **15. Success Criteria** 74 74 [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 75 75