Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -1,75 +1,198 @@
1		-**~1. Title of the Experiment**
	1	+**Experiment title**
2	2	[Short, descriptive title]
3	3
	4	+
4	4	**2. Objective / Research Question**
5		-[What are you trying to learn, test, or compare?]
	6	+Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6	6
	8	+1. Mission effectiveness
	9	+1. Mission efficiency
	10	+1. FR Health
	11	+1. FR and victim safety
	12	+
	13	+
7	7	**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
8		-[If applicable, what do you expect to observe?]
	15	+See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
9	9
	17	+* CL01: Improve safety for responders
	18	+* CL02: Increased SA
	19	+* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
	20	+* CL04: acceptable workload
	21	+* CL05: trustworthy SA
	22	+* CL06: improved FR health
	23	+* CL07: degraded mission efficiency
	24	+
	25	+
10	10	**4. Scenario / Context**
11		-[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs]
	27	+ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
12	12
	29	+Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
	30	+
	31	+* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
	32	+* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
	33	+* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
	34	+** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
	35	+** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
	36	+
	37	+
13	13	**5. Participants**
14	14
15		-* FR team 1:
	40	+* FR team ROBOT:
16	16	** 1x Squad leaders
17	17	** 1x Robot operator
18	18	** 1x Robot analyst
19	19	** 2x First responder
20		-* FR team:
	45	+* FR team HUMAN:
21	21	** 1x Squad leaders
22	22	** 2x First reponder
23	23	* Base of Operations:
24		-** 1x Safety officer
	49	+** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
25	25	** Team lead
26		-Number of participants: 9
27	27
	52	+Number of participants: 9
	53	+
	54	+
28	28	**6. System(s) Under Test**
29	29
30		-* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)]
31		-* Version / configuration: [Describe]
32		-* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview]
	57	+|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
	58	+|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
	59	+* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
	60	+* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
	61	+* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
	62	+* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
	63	+* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
	64	+* NO autonomy.
	65	+)))
	66	+|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
	67	+* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
	68	+* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
	69	+* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
	70	+)))
	71	+|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
	72	+* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
	73	+* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
	74	+* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
	75	+* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
	76	+)))
	77	+|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
	78	+* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
	79	+* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
	80	+* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
	81	+* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
	82	+)))
33	33
	84	+
	85	+
34	34	**7. Tasks**
35		-[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence]
36	36
	88	+[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
	89	+
	90	+[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
	91	+
	92	+
37	37	**8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
38		-[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
39	39
	95	+Two buildings:
	96	+
	97	+* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
	98	+* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
	99	+*
	100	+
	101	+Trial 1:
	102	+
	103	+* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
	104	+* FR team HUMAN does Building B
	105	+
	106	+Trial 2:
	107	+
	108	+* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
	109	+* FR team HUMAN does Building A
	110	+
	111	+
40	40	**9. Measurements**
41	41
42		-* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
43		-* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
44		-* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
	114	+See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
45	45
	116	+
46	46	**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
47	47
48		-1. [Describe preparation]
49		-1. [Briefing]
50		-1. [Execution]
51		-1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
	119	+1. Team preparation:
	120	+11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
	121	+11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
	122	+11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
	123	+11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
	124	+1. Experiment preparation
	125	+11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
	126	+1. Briefing:
	127	+11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
	128	+11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
	129	+1. Execution:
	130	+11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
	131	+11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
	132	+11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
	133	+111. Mission completion time
	134	+111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
	135	+111. Time for tackling any health alerts
	136	+111. Track FR path
	137	+1. Hotwash:
	138	+11. Questions on:
	139	+111. Near-incident report
	140	+111. Path inside
	141	+111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
	142	+111. Mission effectiveness
	143	+111. Self-reported workload
	144	+111. Trust survey
52	52
53		-**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
54		-[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
	146	+Planning:
55	55
56		-**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
	148	+* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
	149	+* Trial 1:
	150	+** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
	151	+** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
	152	+** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
	153	+** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
	154	+** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
	155	+** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
	156	+* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
	157	+* Trial 2:
	158	+** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
	159	+** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
	160	+** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
	161	+** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
	162	+** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
	163	+** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
57	57
58		-* Risks: [Describe]
59		-* Mitigations: [Describe]
60		-* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
61		-* Data handling: [Describe]
62	62
63		-**13. Location & Duration**
64	64
65		-* Location: [Where does it take place?]
66		-* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
	167	+**~11. Materials**
67	67
	169	+* For FRs:
	170	+** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
	171	+** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
	172	+** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
	173	+** 4x Health sensors
	174	+** 4x Location sensors
	175	+** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
	176	+* For usecase:
	177	+** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
	178	+** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
	179	+** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
	180	+* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
	181	+
	182	+
68	68	**14. Dependencies**
69		-[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
70	70
	185	+* Availability of materials
	186	+* Availaibility and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
	187	+* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
	188	+* Availability of:
	189	+** Experiment participants
	190	+** People willing to play victim
	191	+** Experiment leaders
	192	+
	193	+
71	71	**15. Success Criteria**
72		-[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
	195	+When mission completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance.
73	73
74	74
75	75