Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test

Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
	1	+h. Test SFT1

Content

...	...	@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1	1	**Experiment title**
2		-System baseline test
	2	+[Short, descriptive title]
3	3
4	4
5	5	**2. Objective / Research Question**
6		-Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
	6	+Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7	7
8	8	1. Mission effectiveness
9	9	1. Mission efficiency
...	...	@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
10	10	1. FR Health
11	11	1. FR and victim safety
12	12
	13	+
13	13	**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14	14	See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15	15
...	...	@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
21	21	* CL06: improved FR health
22	22	* CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23	23
	25	+
24	24	**4. Scenario / Context**
25	25	ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
26	26
...	...	@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
32	32	** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33	33	** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34	34
	37	+
35	35	**5. Participants**
36	36
37	37	* FR team ROBOT:
...	...	@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
93	93
94	94	* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
95	95	* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
	99	+*
96	96
97	97	Trial 1:
98	98
...	...	@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
104	104	* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105	105	* FR team HUMAN does Building A
106	106
	111	+
107	107	**9. Measurements**
108	108
109	109	See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
...	...	@@ -111,17 +111,17 @@
111	111
112	112	**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
113	113
114		-1. __Team preparation__:
	119	+1. Team preparation:
115	115	11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
116	116	11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
117	117	11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
118	118	11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
119		-1. __Experiment preparation:__
	124	+1. Experiment preparation
120	120	11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
121		-1. __Briefing:__
	126	+1. Briefing:
122	122	11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
123	123	11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
124		-1. __Execution:__
	129	+1. Execution:
125	125	11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
126	126	11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
127	127	11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
...	...	@@ -129,17 +129,16 @@
129	129	111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
130	130	111. Time for tackling any health alerts
131	131	111. Track FR path
132		-1. __Hotwash__:
133		-11. Questions (specified per role) on:
	137	+1. Hotwash:
	138	+11. Questions on:
134	134	111. Near-incident report
135	135	111. Path inside
136	136	111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
137		-111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness?
	142	+111. Mission effectiveness
138	138	111. Self-reported workload
139	139	111. Trust survey
140		-11. Group discussion with feedback
141	141
142		-**~11. Planning:**
	146	+Planning:
143	143
144	144	* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
145	145	* Trial 1:
...	...	@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
160	160
161	161
162	162
163		-**12. Materials**
	167	+**~11. Materials**
164	164
165	165	* For FRs:
166	166	** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
...	...	@@ -175,10 +175,11 @@
175	175	** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
176	176	* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
177	177
178		-**13. Dependencies**
179	179
	183	+**14. Dependencies**
	184	+
180	180	* Availability of materials
181		-* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
	186	+* Availaibility and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
182	182	* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
183	183	* Availability of:
184	184	** Experiment participants
...	...	@@ -185,8 +185,9 @@
185	185	** People willing to play victim
186	186	** Experiment leaders
187	187
188		-**14. Success Criteria**
189		-When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
190	190
	194	+**15. Success Criteria**
	195	+[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
191	191
	197	+
192	192