Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:21
on 2026/03/23 13:21
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,36 +1,113 @@ 1 +**Experiment title** 2 +[Short, descriptive title] 1 1 2 2 5 +**2. Objective / Research Question** 6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 3 3 4 -**~1. Title of the Experiment** 5 -[Short, descriptive title] 8 +1. Mission effectiveness 9 +1. Mission efficiency 10 +1. FR Health 11 +1. FR and victim safety 6 6 7 -**2. Objective / Research Question** 8 -[What are you trying to learn, test, or compare?] 9 9 10 10 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 11 - [If applicable,what doyouexpect toobserve?]15 +See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 12 12 17 +* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 +* CL02: Increased SA 19 +* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 +* CL04: acceptable workload 21 +* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 +* CL06: improved FR health 23 +* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 + 25 + 13 13 **4. Scenario / Context** 14 - [Short description of the operationalor simulatedscenarioin which theexperiment runs]27 +ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 15 15 29 +Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 + 31 +* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 +* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 +* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 +** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 +** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 + 37 + 16 16 **5. Participants** 17 17 18 -* Target group: [E.g., firefighters, police, SME observers] 19 -* Number of participants: [X] 20 -* Role(s) during the experiment: [Describe roles] 40 +* FR team ROBOT: 41 +** 1x Squad leaders 42 +** 1x Robot operator 43 +** 1x Robot analyst 44 +** 2x First responder 45 +* FR team HUMAN: 46 +** 1x Squad leaders 47 +** 2x First reponder 48 +* Base of Operations: 49 +** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist 50 +** Team lead 21 21 52 +Number of participants: 9 53 + 54 + 22 22 **6. System(s) Under Test** 23 23 24 -* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)] 25 -* Version / configuration: [Describe] 26 -* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview] 57 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 +|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 +* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 +* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 +* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 +* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 +* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 +* NO autonomy. 65 +))) 66 +|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 +* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 +* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 +* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 +))) 71 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 +* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 +* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 +* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 +* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 +))) 77 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 +* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 +* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 +* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 +* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 +))) 27 27 84 + 85 + 28 28 **7. Tasks** 29 -[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence] 30 30 88 +[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 + 90 +[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 + 92 + 31 31 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 + 95 +Two buildings: 96 + 97 +* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 +* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 99 + 100 + 101 + 102 +Trial1: 103 + 104 +* FR Team ROBOT does easy 105 + 106 +Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 107 + 32 32 [Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 33 33 110 + 34 34 **9. Measurements** 35 35 36 36 * Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] ... ... @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ 37 37 * Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 38 38 * Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 39 39 117 + 40 40 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 41 41 42 42 1. [Describe preparation] ... ... @@ -44,9 +44,11 @@ 44 44 1. [Execution] 45 45 1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 46 46 125 + 47 47 **~11. Materials / Setup Components** 48 48 [List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 49 49 129 + 50 50 **12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 51 51 52 52 * Risks: [Describe] ... ... @@ -54,14 +54,17 @@ 54 54 * Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 55 55 * Data handling: [Describe] 56 56 137 + 57 57 **13. Location & Duration** 58 58 59 59 * Location: [Where does it take place?] 60 60 * Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 61 61 143 + 62 62 **14. Dependencies** 63 63 [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 64 64 147 + 65 65 **15. Success Criteria** 66 66 [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 67 67