Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.19
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/24 09:19
on 2026/03/24 09:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 3.3
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2026/03/25 14:36
on 2026/03/25 14:36
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. TjallingHaije1 +XWiki.RosaVanTuijn - Content
-
... ... @@ -106,9 +106,105 @@ 106 106 107 107 **9. Measurements** 108 108 109 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 109 +See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]. Compare outcomes between the two conditions teams if applicable. 110 110 111 +|**Claim: Safety [CL01]**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 112 +|Safer decision before entry|Safe path chosen|((( 113 +* Define ground-truth safe path(s) beforehand so that they can be compared to chosen entry path during the trial 114 +* Score paths beforehand: safe/ suboptimal/ unsafe 115 +))) 116 +|Better decision overall|"How good were you decisions looking back?"|((( 117 +* Hotwash reflection question (likert + open) 118 +* Observations of errors (e.g. near-incidents, unsafe choices) 119 +))) 120 +|Fewer dangerous situations|Near-incident reports|((( 121 +* Define hazards in buildings beforehand and check (with observations of during hotwash) if these hazards are avoided or not 122 +))) 111 111 124 +|**Claim: Situation Awareness [CL02]**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 125 +|Before entry |((( 126 +Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout 127 +)))|((( 128 +* Before entry let squad leader and entry team (seperatly) sketch/map or describe inside of building (harzards, victims, layout) > compare these with the ground-truth 129 + 130 +((( 131 + 132 +))) 133 +))) 134 +|During entry|((( 135 +FR path logs 136 +)))|((( 137 +* Compare plannend vs. executed path (how many or how big were the deviations? and were they acceptable?) and identify detours caused by misjudgment or new information 138 + 139 +((( 140 + 141 +))) 142 +))) 143 +|After mission|((( 144 +Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout 145 +)))|((( 146 +* Repeat sketching/mapping or descriptive task and compare the outcomes (improvement/ deterioration vs pre-entry) 147 +))) 148 + 149 +|**Claim: Mission effectiveness [CL03] [CL04] [CL05]**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 150 +|((( 151 +Acceptable workload 152 +)))|((( 153 + 154 + 155 +NASA-TLX 156 +)))|((( 157 +* Shortened post-trial NASA-TLX questionnaire and analyze score (discuss if these with experts to check if these are "acceptable") 158 + 159 +((( 160 + 161 +))) 162 +))) 163 +|((( 164 +Appropriate trust 165 +)))|((( 166 + 167 + 168 +Trust survey / interviews 169 +)))|((( 170 +* 171 +))) 172 +|((( 173 +Decision confidence 174 +)))|((( 175 + 176 + 177 +Retrospective decision quality rating 178 +)))| 179 + 180 +|**Claim: Health [CL06]**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 181 +|((( 182 +Health remains acceptable 183 +)))|((( 184 + 185 + 186 +Health indicators 187 +)))|((( 188 +* Define acceptable ranges (e.g. HR, temperature, etc.) beforehand and log these ranges 189 +))) 190 +|((( 191 +Issues handled in time 192 +)))|((( 193 + 194 + 195 +Health issues tackled in acceptable time 196 +)))|((( 197 +* Timestamp when acceptable ranges are breached till moment detection and intervention moment (compare this with predefined response thresholds) 198 +))) 199 + 200 +|**Claim: Mission Efficiency [CL07]**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 201 +|Faster mission execution|Total mission completion time|((( 202 +* Timestamp of start (after briefing) till all located victims have been extracted 203 +))) 204 +|Faster inside performance|First responder time inside|((( 205 +* Timestamp of entry building till exist building (last located victim is exstracted) 206 +))) 207 + 112 112 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 113 113 114 114 1. __Team preparation__: ... ... @@ -130,11 +130,11 @@ 130 130 111. Time for tackling any health alerts 131 131 111. Track FR path 132 132 1. __Hotwash__: 133 -11. Questions (specified per role) on: 229 +11. Questions (specified per role, couple questions per topic) on: 134 134 111. Near-incident report 135 135 111. Path inside 136 136 111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 137 -111. Mission effectiveness ? DecisionMakingeffectiveness?233 +111. Mission effectiveness: e.g. self reported effectiveness of decisions 138 138 111. Self-reported workload 139 139 111. Trust survey 140 140 11. Group discussion with feedback ... ... @@ -143,20 +143,20 @@ 143 143 144 144 * Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour. 145 145 * Trial 1: 146 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30242 +** Setup scenario: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 147 147 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 148 148 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30 149 149 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30 150 150 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00 151 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00247 +** Scenario reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00 152 152 * Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15 153 153 * Trial 2: 154 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00250 +** (Setup scenario: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00) 155 155 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 156 156 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00 157 157 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00 158 158 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30 159 -* *Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30255 +* Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30 160 160 161 161 162 162