Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.19
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/24 09:19
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.11
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
1 +h. Test SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1 1  **Experiment title**
2 -System baseline test
2 +[Short, descriptive title]
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 8  1. Mission effectiveness
9 9  1. Mission efficiency
... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
10 10  1. FR Health
11 11  1. FR and victim safety
12 12  
13 +
13 13  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 14  See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15 15  
... ... @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
21 21  * CL06: improved FR health
22 22  * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23 23  
25 +
24 24  **4. Scenario / Context**
25 25  ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
26 26  
... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
32 32  ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 33  ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34 34  
37 +
35 35  **5. Participants**
36 36  
37 37  * FR team ROBOT:
... ... @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@
93 93  
94 94  * Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
95 95  * Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
99 +*
96 96  
97 97  Trial 1:
98 98  
... ... @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
104 104  * FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 105  * FR team HUMAN does Building A
106 106  
111 +
107 107  **9. Measurements**
108 108  
109 109  See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
... ... @@ -111,17 +111,16 @@
111 111  
112 112  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
113 113  
114 -1. __Team preparation__:
119 +1. Team training:
115 115  11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
116 116  11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
117 117  11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
118 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
119 -1. __Experiment preparation:__
123 +1. Usecase preparation
120 120  11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
121 -1. __Briefing:__
125 +1. Briefing:
122 122  11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
123 123  11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
124 -1. __Execution:__
128 +1. Execution:
125 125  11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
126 126  11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
127 127  11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
... ... @@ -129,19 +129,18 @@
129 129  111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
130 130  111. Time for tackling any health alerts
131 131  111. Track FR path
132 -1. __Hotwash__:
133 -11. Questions (specified per role) on:
136 +1. Hotwash:
137 +11. Questions on:
134 134  111. Near-incident report
135 135  111. Path inside
136 136  111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
137 -111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness?
141 +111. Mission effectiveness
138 138  111. Self-reported workload
139 139  111. Trust survey
140 -11. Group discussion with feedback
141 141  
142 -**~11. Planning:**
145 +Planning:
143 143  
144 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
147 +* Team training:  Day before. 1 hour.
145 145  * Trial 1:
146 146  ** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
147 147  ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
... ... @@ -160,33 +160,17 @@
160 160  
161 161  
162 162  
163 -**12. Materials**
164 164  
165 -* For FRs:
166 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
167 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
168 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
169 -** 4x Health sensors
170 -** 4x Location sensors
171 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
172 -* For usecase:
173 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
174 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
175 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
176 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
167 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
168 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
177 177  
178 -**13. Dependencies**
179 179  
180 -* Availability of materials
181 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
182 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
183 -* Availability of:
184 -** Experiment participants
185 -** People willing to play victim
186 -** Experiment leaders
171 +**14. Dependencies**
172 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
187 187  
188 -**14. Success Criteria**
189 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
190 190  
175 +**15. Success Criteria**
176 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
191 191  
178 +
192 192