Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.17
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:26
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
1 +h. Test SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1 1  **Experiment title**
2 -System baseline test
2 +[Short, descriptive title]
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 8  1. Mission effectiveness
9 9  1. Mission efficiency
... ... @@ -94,104 +94,59 @@
94 94  
95 95  Two buildings:
96 96  
97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
97 +* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
98 +* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
99 99  
100 -Trial 1:
101 101  
102 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
103 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
104 104  
105 -Trial 2:
102 +Trial1:
106 106  
107 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
108 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
104 +* FR Team ROBOT does easy
109 109  
106 +Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
110 110  
108 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
109 +
110 +
111 111  **9. Measurements**
112 112  
113 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
113 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
114 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
115 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
114 114  
115 115  
116 116  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
117 117  
118 -1. __Team preparation__:
119 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
120 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
121 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
122 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
123 -1. __Experiment preparation:__
124 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
125 -1. __Briefing:__
126 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
127 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
128 -1. __Execution:__
129 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
130 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
131 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
132 -111. Mission completion time
133 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
134 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
135 -111. Track FR path
136 -1. __Hotwash__:
137 -11. Questions on:
138 -111. Near-incident report
139 -111. Path inside
140 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
141 -111. Mission effectiveness
142 -111. Self-reported workload
143 -111. Trust survey
120 +1. [Describe preparation]
121 +1. [Briefing]
122 +1. [Execution]
123 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
144 144  
145 -**~11. Planning:**
146 146  
147 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
148 -* Trial 1:
149 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
150 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
151 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
152 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
153 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
154 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
155 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
156 -* Trial 2: 
157 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
158 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
159 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
160 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
161 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
162 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
126 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
127 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
163 163  
164 164  
130 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
165 165  
166 -**12. Materials**
132 +* Risks: [Describe]
133 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
134 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
135 +* Data handling: [Describe]
167 167  
168 -* For FRs:
169 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
170 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
171 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
172 -** 4x Health sensors
173 -** 4x Location sensors
174 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
175 -* For usecase:
176 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
177 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
178 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
179 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
180 180  
138 +**13. Location & Duration**
181 181  
182 -**13. Dependencies**
140 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
141 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
183 183  
184 -* Availability of materials
185 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
186 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
187 -* Availability of:
188 -** Experiment participants
189 -** People willing to play victim
190 -** Experiment leaders
191 191  
144 +**14. Dependencies**
145 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
192 192  
193 -**14. Success Criteria**
194 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
195 195  
148 +**15. Success Criteria**
149 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
196 196  
151 +
197 197