Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.13
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:21
on 2026/03/23 15:21
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:19
on 2026/03/23 13:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,198 +1,0 @@ 1 -**Experiment title** 2 -[Short, descriptive title] 3 - 4 - 5 -**2. Objective / Research Question** 6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 7 - 8 -1. Mission effectiveness 9 -1. Mission efficiency 10 -1. FR Health 11 -1. FR and victim safety 12 - 13 - 14 -**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 15 -See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 16 - 17 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 -* CL02: Increased SA 19 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 -* CL04: acceptable workload 21 -* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 -* CL06: improved FR health 23 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 - 25 - 26 -**4. Scenario / Context** 27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 28 - 29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 - 31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 - 37 - 38 -**5. Participants** 39 - 40 -* FR team ROBOT: 41 -** 1x Squad leaders 42 -** 1x Robot operator 43 -** 1x Robot analyst 44 -** 2x First responder 45 -* FR team HUMAN: 46 -** 1x Squad leaders 47 -** 2x First reponder 48 -* Base of Operations: 49 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist 50 -** Team lead 51 - 52 -Number of participants: 9 53 - 54 - 55 -**6. System(s) Under Test** 56 - 57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 -* NO autonomy. 65 -))) 66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 -))) 71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 -))) 77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 -))) 83 - 84 - 85 - 86 -**7. Tasks** 87 - 88 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 - 90 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 - 92 - 93 -**8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 - 95 -Two buildings: 96 - 97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 99 -* 100 - 101 -Trial 1: 102 - 103 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A 104 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B 105 - 106 -Trial 2: 107 - 108 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B 109 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A 110 - 111 - 112 -**9. Measurements** 113 - 114 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 115 - 116 - 117 -**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 118 - 119 -1. Team preparation: 120 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 121 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 122 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 123 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!) 124 -1. Experiment preparation 125 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc. 126 -1. Briefing: 127 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 128 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 129 -1. Execution: 130 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 131 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 132 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: 133 -111. Mission completion time 134 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 135 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts 136 -111. Track FR path 137 -1. Hotwash: 138 -11. Questions on: 139 -111. Near-incident report 140 -111. Path inside 141 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 142 -111. Mission effectiveness 143 -111. Self-reported workload 144 -111. Trust survey 145 - 146 -Planning: 147 - 148 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour. 149 -* Trial 1: 150 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 151 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 152 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30 153 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30 154 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00 155 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00 156 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15 157 -* Trial 2: 158 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 159 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 160 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00 161 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00 162 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30 163 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30 164 - 165 - 166 - 167 -**~11. Materials** 168 - 169 -* For FRs: 170 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking 171 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare) 172 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I 173 -** 4x Health sensors 174 -** 4x Location sensors 175 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO). 176 -* For usecase: 177 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?) 178 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc. 179 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims. 180 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires 181 - 182 - 183 -**14. Dependencies** 184 - 185 -* Availability of materials 186 -* Availaibility and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings 187 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO. 188 -* Availability of: 189 -** Experiment participants 190 -** People willing to play victim 191 -** Experiment leaders 192 - 193 - 194 -**15. Success Criteria** 195 -[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 196 - 197 - 198 -