Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.12
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:15
on 2026/03/23 15:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.19
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/24 09:19
on 2026/03/24 09:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -h. Test SFT1 1 +h. Test SFT1: System baseline test - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ 1 1 **Experiment title** 2 - [Short, descriptive title]2 +System baseline test 3 3 4 4 5 5 **2. Objective / Research Question** 6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the belowSYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects? 7 7 8 8 1. Mission effectiveness 9 9 1. Mission efficiency ... ... @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ 10 10 1. FR Health 11 11 1. FR and victim safety 12 12 13 - 14 14 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 15 15 See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 16 16 ... ... @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ 22 22 * CL06: improved FR health 23 23 * CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 24 25 - 26 26 **4. Scenario / Context** 27 27 ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 28 28 ... ... @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ 34 34 ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 35 ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 36 37 - 38 38 **5. Participants** 39 39 40 40 * FR team ROBOT: ... ... @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ 96 96 97 97 * Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 98 98 * Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 99 -* 100 100 101 101 Trial 1: 102 102 ... ... @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ 108 108 * FR Team ROBOT does Building B 109 109 * FR team HUMAN does Building A 110 110 111 - 112 112 **9. Measurements** 113 113 114 114 See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] ... ... @@ -116,16 +116,17 @@ 116 116 117 117 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 118 118 119 -1. Team training:114 +1. __Team preparation__: 120 120 11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 121 121 11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 122 122 11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 123 -1. Usecase preparation 118 +11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!) 119 +1. __Experiment preparation:__ 124 124 11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc. 125 -1. Briefing: 121 +1. __Briefing:__ 126 126 11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 127 127 11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 128 -1. Execution: 124 +1. __Execution:__ 129 129 11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 130 130 11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 131 131 11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: ... ... @@ -133,18 +133,19 @@ 133 133 111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 134 134 111. Time for tackling any health alerts 135 135 111. Track FR path 136 -1. Hotwash: 137 -11. Questions on: 132 +1. __Hotwash__: 133 +11. Questions (specified per role) on: 138 138 111. Near-incident report 139 139 111. Path inside 140 140 111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 141 -111. Mission effectiveness 137 +111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness? 142 142 111. Self-reported workload 143 143 111. Trust survey 140 +11. Group discussion with feedback 144 144 145 -Planning: 142 +**~11. Planning:** 146 146 147 -* Team training:Day before. 1 hour.144 +* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour. 148 148 * Trial 1: 149 149 ** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 150 150 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 ... ... @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ 163 163 164 164 165 165 166 -** ~11. Materials**163 +**12. Materials** 167 167 168 168 * For FRs: 169 169 ** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking ... ... @@ -178,14 +178,18 @@ 178 178 ** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims. 179 179 * 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires 180 180 178 +**13. Dependencies** 181 181 182 -**14. Dependencies** 183 -[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 180 +* Availability of materials 181 +* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings 182 +* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO. 183 +* Availability of: 184 +** Experiment participants 185 +** People willing to play victim 186 +** Experiment leaders 184 184 188 +**14. Success Criteria** 189 +When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics. 185 185 186 186 187 -**15. Success Criteria** 188 -[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 189 - 190 - 191 191