Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.11
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:21
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,177 +3,67 @@
1 -**Experiment title**
2 -[Short, descriptive title]
3 3  
4 4  
5 -**2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 -1. Mission effectiveness
9 -1. Mission efficiency
10 -1. FR Health
11 -1. FR and victim safety
4 +**~1. Title of the Experiment**
5 +[Short, descriptive title]
12 12  
7 +**2. Objective / Research Question**
8 +[What are you trying to learn, test, or compare?]
13 13  
14 14  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
15 -See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
11 +[If applicable, what do you expect to observe?]
16 16  
17 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders
18 -* CL02: Increased SA
19 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
20 -* CL04: acceptable workload
21 -* CL05: trustworthy SA
22 -* CL06: improved FR health
23 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency
24 -
25 -
26 26  **4. Scenario / Context**
27 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
14 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs]
28 28  
29 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
30 -
31 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
32 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
33 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
34 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
35 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
36 -
37 -
38 38  **5. Participants**
39 39  
40 -* FR team ROBOT:
41 -** 1x Squad leaders
42 -** 1x Robot operator
43 -** 1x Robot analyst
44 -** 2x First responder
45 -* FR team HUMAN:
46 -** 1x Squad leaders
47 -** 2x First reponder
48 -* Base of Operations:
49 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
50 -** Team lead
18 +* Target group: [E.g., firefighters, police, SME observers]
19 +* Number of participants: [X]
20 +* Role(s) during the experiment: [Describe roles]
51 51  
52 -Number of participants: 9 
53 -
54 -
55 55  **6. System(s) Under Test**
56 56  
57 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
58 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
59 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
60 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
61 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
62 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
63 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
64 -* NO autonomy.
65 -)))
66 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
67 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
68 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
69 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
70 -)))
71 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
72 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
73 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
74 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
75 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
76 -)))
77 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
78 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
79 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
80 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
81 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
82 -)))
24 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)]
25 +* Version / configuration: [Describe]
26 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview]
83 83  
84 -
85 -
86 86  **7. Tasks**
29 +[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence]
87 87  
88 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
89 -
90 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 
91 -
92 -
93 93  **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
32 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
94 94  
95 -Two buildings:
96 -
97 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
98 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
99 -*
100 -
101 -Trial 1:
102 -
103 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
104 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
105 -
106 -Trial 2:
107 -
108 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
109 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
110 -
111 -
112 112  **9. Measurements**
113 113  
114 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
36 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
37 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
38 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
115 115  
116 -
117 117  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
118 118  
119 -1. Team training:
120 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
121 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
122 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
123 -1. Usecase preparation
124 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
125 -1. Briefing:
126 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
127 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
128 -1. Execution:
129 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
130 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
131 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
132 -111. Mission completion time
133 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
134 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
135 -111. Track FR path
136 -1. Hotwash:
137 -11. Questions on:
138 -111. Near-incident report
139 -111. Path inside
140 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
141 -111. Mission effectiveness
142 -111. Self-reported workload
143 -111. Trust survey
42 +1. [Describe preparation]
43 +1. [Briefing]
44 +1. [Execution]
45 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
144 144  
145 -Planning:
47 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
48 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
146 146  
147 -* Team training:  Day before. 1 hour.
148 -* Trial 1:
149 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
150 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
151 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
152 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
153 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
154 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
155 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
156 -* Trial 2: 
157 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
158 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
159 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
160 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
161 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
162 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
50 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
163 163  
52 +* Risks: [Describe]
53 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
54 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
55 +* Data handling: [Describe]
164 164  
57 +**13. Location & Duration**
165 165  
59 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
60 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
166 166  
167 -**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
168 -[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
169 -
170 -
171 171  **14. Dependencies**
172 172  [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
173 173  
174 -
175 175  **15. Success Criteria**
176 176  [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
177 177