Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:19
on 2026/03/23 13:19
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,152 @@ 1 +**Experiment title** 2 +[Short, descriptive title] 3 + 4 + 5 +**2. Objective / Research Question** 6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 7 + 8 +1. Mission effectiveness 9 +1. Mission efficiency 10 +1. FR Health 11 +1. FR and victim safety 12 + 13 + 14 +**3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 15 +See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 16 + 17 +* CL01: Improve safety for responders 18 +* CL02: Increased SA 19 +* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness 20 +* CL04: acceptable workload 21 +* CL05: trustworthy SA 22 +* CL06: improved FR health 23 +* CL07: degraded mission efficiency 24 + 25 + 26 +**4. Scenario / Context** 27 +ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 28 + 29 +Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] : 30 + 31 +* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. 32 +* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. 33 +* Specific to scenario with ANYmal: 34 +** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 35 +** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 36 + 37 + 38 +**5. Participants** 39 + 40 +* FR team ROBOT: 41 +** 1x Squad leaders 42 +** 1x Robot operator 43 +** 1x Robot analyst 44 +** 2x First responder 45 +* FR team HUMAN: 46 +** 1x Squad leaders 47 +** 2x First reponder 48 +* Base of Operations: 49 +** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist 50 +** Team lead 51 + 52 +Number of participants: 9 53 + 54 + 55 +**6. System(s) Under Test** 56 + 57 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description 58 +|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 59 +* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 60 +* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??) 61 +* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 62 +* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback. 63 +* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 64 +* NO autonomy. 65 +))) 66 +|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 67 +* Interoperability with health and location sensors. 68 +* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible). 69 +* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure). 70 +))) 71 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 72 +* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 73 +* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions. 74 +* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 75 +* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 76 +))) 77 +|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)((( 78 +* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 79 +* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use. 80 +* Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 81 +* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 82 +))) 83 + 84 + 85 + 86 +**7. Tasks** 87 + 88 +[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 89 + 90 +[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 91 + 92 + 93 +**8. Experimental Conditions / Variants** 94 + 95 +Two buildings: 96 + 97 +* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 +* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 99 + 100 + 101 + 102 +Trial1: 103 + 104 +* FR Team ROBOT does easy 105 + 106 +Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 107 + 108 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 109 + 110 + 111 +**9. Measurements** 112 + 113 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] 114 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 115 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 116 + 117 + 118 +**10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 119 + 120 +1. [Describe preparation] 121 +1. [Briefing] 122 +1. [Execution] 123 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 124 + 125 + 126 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components** 127 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 128 + 129 + 130 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 131 + 132 +* Risks: [Describe] 133 +* Mitigations: [Describe] 134 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 135 +* Data handling: [Describe] 136 + 137 + 138 +**13. Location & Duration** 139 + 140 +* Location: [Where does it take place?] 141 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 142 + 143 + 144 +**14. Dependencies** 145 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 146 + 147 + 148 +**15. Success Criteria** 149 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 150 + 151 + 152 +