Wiki source code of j. SFT1 evaluation templates

Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/05/05 11:58

Hide last authors
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 1 = General =
2
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.1 3 [[image:1777962330814-818.png]]
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.2 4
5
Rosa Van Tuijn 14.1 6 |(% colspan="3" %)[[image:1776259393121-951.png]]
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.2 7 |**Baseline phases**|**Who fills it**|**Main purpose**
8 |//Briefing//|-|-
9 |//Estimate building integrity//|-|-
10 |//Shoring//|Particpants|(make estimation about shoring time)
11 |//Before sending in FRs (DM)//|Participant|Ground truth/ baseline SA
12 |//Send in FRs, identify voids, DM//|Evaluation leader|Objective performance, safety, timing, decision making
13 |//FRs exit building//|Participant|Subjective SA, trust, workload, decision making
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.1 14 |//Hotwash//| |
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 15
Rosa Van Tuijn 14.1 16 |(% colspan="3" style="width:414px" %)[[image:1776259356197-904.png]]
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.2 17 |(% style="width:414px" %)**SYNERGISE phases**|(% style="width:245px" %)**Who fills it**|(% style="width:690px" %)**Main purpose**
18 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Briefing//|(% style="width:245px" %)-|(% style="width:690px" %)-
19 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Estimate building integrity//|(% style="width:245px" %)-|(% style="width:690px" %)-
20 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Send in robots, identify voids with robots//|(% style="width:245px" %)-|(% style="width:690px" %)-
21 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Decision Making (DM)//|(% style="width:245px" %)Participants (Squad/ team leader)|(% style="width:690px" %)Ground truth/ baseline SA
22 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Send in FRs ?//|(% style="width:245px" %)Evaluation leader|(% style="width:690px" %)Objective performance, safety, timing, decision making
23 |(% style="width:414px" %)//After test//|(% style="width:245px" %)Paricipant|(% style="width:690px" %)Subjective SA, trust, workload, decision making
24 |(% style="width:414px" %)//Hotwash//|(% style="width:245px" %) |(% style="width:690px" %)
25
Tjalling Haije 25.3 26 == List of ground truths needed for comparison: ==
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 27
28 * Health ranges
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 29 * hazards/ victims in buildings + Safest path within buildings : Safety observations + path observations >> have a premade map with everything and note down the route. Have an expert rate it after the fact.
30 * Decision quality: have expert (or team leaders) rate the path of the FRs inside
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.1 31 * State of automation (tech question)
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 32
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 33 = Templates per role =
Rosa Van Tuijn 2.1 34
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 35 (% class="table-bordered" %)
36 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.3 37 == Template: Evaluation leader (Field) ==
38 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 39 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
40 **General: **
41
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 42 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: Baseline / SYNERGISE-tech supported
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 43 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 44 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 45 System & mission readiness
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 46
47 //(Tick list based on predefined acceptable ranges. Cross out if not applicable.)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 48 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
49 ☐ C3I operational, describe: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 50
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 51 ☐ Health & location sensors connected, describe: .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 52
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 53 ☐ Acceptable/ baseline health ranges defined (HR, temperature, etc.), describe: .....................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 54
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 55 ☐ OWL operational, describe: .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 56
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 57 ☐ ANYmal operational, describe: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 58
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 59 ☐ ANYmal with robot arm operational, describe: ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 60
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 61 ☐ ANYmal with SNAKE, describe: ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 12.1 62 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 63 |(% colspan="2" %)**PRE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 64 |(% style="width:296px" %)Hand out questionnaires|(% style="width:1053px" %)Each role their own question for this section
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 65 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 66 Start time of scenario
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.1 67 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 68 **Timestamp of start of the scenario:.....................................................................................**
69 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 70 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**DURING ENTRY PHASE**
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 71 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 72 (if squad leader gets a questionnaire after DM, before human entry; pause timer or enter timestamps)
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 73 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
74 Timestamp of entering:..................................................................................... | Timestamp of exiting:...........................................................................................................
75 )))
76 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 77 Time within building/ hazard zone (humans)
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 78 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
79 Timestamp of entering:..................................................................................... | Timestamp of exiting:...........................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 80
81 Timestamp of entering:..................................................................................... | Timestamp of exiting:...........................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 82 )))
83 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 84 Time within building/ hazard zone (robots)
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 85 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 86 Timestamp of entering:..................................................................................... | Timestamp of exiting:...........................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.2 87
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 88 Timestamp of entering:..................................................................................... | Timestamp of exiting:...........................................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 89 )))
90 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 91 Events with timestamp
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 92 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 93 Timestamp of victim detected:......................................................................... | Timestamp of victim detected:.............................................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 94
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 95 Timestamp of victim detected:......................................................................... | Timestamp of victim detected:.............................................................................................
96
97
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 98 Timestamp of manual robot control takeover:.................................................. | Timestamp of manual robot control takeover:....................................................................
99
100 Timestamp of manual robot control takeover:.................................................. | Timestamp of manual robot control takeover:....................................................................
101
102
103 Timestamp of health sensor notification:......................................................... | Timestamp of health sensor notification:............................................................................
104
105 Timestamp of health sensor notification:......................................................... | Timestamp of health sensor notification:............................................................................
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 106 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 107 |(% style="width:296px" %)End time of scenario|(% style="width:1053px" %)**Timestamp of finishing the scenario:........................................................................................................**
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 108 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
109 |(% style="width:296px" %)Give every role their questionnaire|(% style="width:1053px" %)
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 110 |(% style="width:296px" %)Plenary questions: |(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
111 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)Open questions
112 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)(((
113 What was the plan/intent for the mission, and what did you personally aim to achieve?// (1–2 sentences)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.3 114
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 115
116
117 )))
118 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)(((
119 What went well and should be sustained? Give one concrete example. //(example + why it worked)//
120
121
122
123 )))
124 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)(((
125 What did not go as intended? Give one concrete example and its impact. //(example + consequence)//
126
127
128
129 )))
130 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)(((
131 Why did it happen? What were the main contributing factors? //(e.g., information/SA, communication, coordination, timing, tools/technology, environment)//
132
133
134
135 )))
136 |(% colspan="2" style="width:587px" %)(((
137 What are the top 2 actionable improvements for next time (specific, doable)? //(Action + owner/role + when)//
138
139
140
141 )))
142
143
144 )))
145
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 146 (% class="table-bordered" %)
147 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 148 == Template: Squad/ Team leader (Field) ==
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 149 )))
150 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
151 **General: **
Rosa Van Tuijn 9.3 152
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 153 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: Baseline / SYNERGISE-tech supported
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 154 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 155 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**PRE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 156 |(% style="width:296px" %)Baseline robot/ automation experience|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
157 |Statement
158 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 159 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation in my daily work (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 160
161 Write down which (optional)
162
163
164
165 )))
166 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 167 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation within the SYNERGISE project (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 168
169 Write down which (optional)
170
171
172
173 )))
174 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 175 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 176 (CL01) Safety Plan Confirmation
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 177 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 178 Mark chosen entry path on provided building map. //Sketch or describe entry path. (Sketch space)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 179
180
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 181
182
183
184 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 185 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL02) Situation Awareness (SAGAT; Endsley 1988):|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 186 List expected hazards and victims with details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Bullets and/ or sketch)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 187
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 188
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 189
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 190
191 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 192 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
193 (CL02) Situation Awareness interior (SAGAT; Endsley 1988):
194
195
196 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 197 Sketch/ Describe expected interior layout. //(Sketch space)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 198
199
200
201
202
203 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 204 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL04) Trust in automation (Baseline (% style="background-color:transparent" %)Scale of Trust in Automated Systems; Jian et al. 2000). IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 205 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
206 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
207 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
208 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
209 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
210 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 211 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**HUMAN ENTRY PHASE**
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 212 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL02 optional; if pause is feasable) Situation Awareness (mid-mission SAGAT probe; Endsley 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.2 213 Where are you team members now and what hazards are near them? //(Sketch space)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 214
215
216
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.2 217
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 218
219 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 220 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 221 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
222 (CL01) Safety Decision Quality Rating (AAR-based; U.S. Army, 1993):
223 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.2 224 |(% style="width:587px" %)Statement|(% style="width:138px" %)1 (LOW)|(% style="width:60px" %)2|(% style="width:57px" %)3|(% style="width:59px" %)4|(% style="width:58px" %)5|(% style="width:60px" %)6|(% style="width:147px" %)7 (HIGH)
225 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 226 I had a clear understanding of the mission objectives, my role, and the intended plan before execution.
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.2 227 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.3 228 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
229 During the mission, I had sufficient situational awareness to understand what was happening and how the situation was evolving.
230 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
231 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
232 The decisions made (by myself and/or the team) during the mission were timely and appropriate given the situation.
233 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
234 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
235 Team coordination and communication were effective and supported successful task execution.
236 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
237 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
238 The tools, systems, or support aids available during the mission effectively supported mission execution.
239 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
240 |(% style="width:587px" %)(((
241 Based on this exercise, the team is better prepared to perform similar missions in the future.
242 )))|(% style="width:138px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:57px" %)☐|(% style="width:59px" %)☐|(% style="width:58px" %)☐|(% style="width:60px" %)☐|(% style="width:147px" %)☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.1 243 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 17.1 244 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
245 (CL01) Safety Error Self-Assessment
246 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
247 List any unsafe or mistaken decisions you recognize from this mission (if any). //(Provide brief descriptions)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.3 248
Rosa Van Tuijn 17.1 249
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.3 250
251 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 252 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
253 (CL02) Situation Awareness (Post-Scenario SAGAT)
254 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 255 From memory, sketch the interior layout and mark all hazards and victims encountered with list of details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Sketch space and bullets)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.3 256
257
258
259
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.2 260 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.3 261 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL03) Workload (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.2 262 |(% style="width:861px" %)Statement|(% style="width:305px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.3 263 Give a score between:
264
265 0 (very low) - 100 (very high)
266 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.2 267 |(% style="width:861px" %)Mental demand - How much mental and perceptual activity was required - thinking, deciding, calculating, searching? Was the task easy or demanding, simple or complex, exacting or forgiving?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690776402-253.png]]
268 |(% style="width:861px" %)Physical demand - How much physical activity was required - pushing, pulling, turning? Was the task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, restful or laborious?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690777988-282.png]]
269 |(% style="width:861px" %)Temporal demand - How much time pressure did you feel? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690778813-812.png]]
270 |(% style="width:861px" %)Effort - How hard did you work mentally and physically to accomplish your level of performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690779609-960.png]]
271 |(% style="width:861px" %)Performance - How successful did you feel in accomplishing the goals of the task? How satisfied were you with your performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690780664-359.png]]
272 |(% style="width:861px" %)Frustration level - How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, content, and relaxed did you feel during the task?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690781527-833.png]]
Rosa Van Tuijn 18.3 273 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.1 274 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 275 (CL04) Trust (Post-Use Trust in Automation scale; Jian et al. 2000) IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.3 276 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
277 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 278 |I would trust this robot system in future missions.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.3 279 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
280 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
281 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
282 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
283 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 16.1 284
Rosa Van Tuijn 13.2 285 == ==
286
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.6 287 (% class="table-bordered" %)
288 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
289 == Template: Robot operator ==
290 )))
291 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
292 **General: **
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.2 293
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.6 294 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: --Baseline --/ SYNERGISE-tech supported
295 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 296 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**PRE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 297 |(% style="width:296px" %)Baseline robot/ automation experience|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
298 |Statement
299 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 300 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation in my daily work (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 301
302 Write down which (optional)
303
304
305
306 )))
307 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 308 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation within the SYNERGISE project (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 309
310 Write down which (optional)
311
312
313
314 )))
315 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.6 316 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL04) Trust in automation (Baseline (% style="background-color:transparent" %)Scale of Trust in Automated Systems; Jian et al. 2000). |(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
317 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 318 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
319 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
320 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
321 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.6 322 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 323 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**AFTER ROBOT entry**
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 324 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 325 (CL02) Situation Awareness Robot Reconnaissance data understanding (OPTIONAL; is more important for the analyst)
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 326 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 327 After the robot’s initial run but before humans enter, list any //hazards, obstacles, or victims// that you (as operator) detected or suspect from the robot’s feed with list of details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Open list)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 328
329
330
331
332 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 333 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 334 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
335 (CL01) SafetyTeam Decision Appraisal:
336 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
337 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
338 |How could you rate the team's decisions during the mission (including the robot) in terms of safety and effectiveness?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
339 |Did your team correctly decide when to send the robot versus humans?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
340 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 341 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
342 (CL01) Safety Error Reflection
343 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
344 List any mistakes or unsafe decisions you think occurred regarding robot deployment. //(Open question)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.2 345
346
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 347
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 348
349 )))
350 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
351 (CL02) Situation Awareness (Post-Scenario SAGAT)
352 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
353 Describe what the robot observed/ found during the mission (e.g. hazards, obstacles) for navigation purposes. //(Sketch space and bullets)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 8.3 354
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 355
356
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 357
358 )))
359 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL03) Workload (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
360 |(% style="width:861px" %)Statement|(% style="width:305px" %)(((
361 Give a score between:
362
363 0 (very low) - 100 (very high)
364 )))
365 |(% style="width:861px" %)Mental demand - How much mental and perceptual activity was required - thinking, deciding, calculating, searching? Was the task easy or demanding, simple or complex, exacting or forgiving?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690776402-253.png]]
366 |(% style="width:861px" %)Physical demand - How much physical activity was required - pushing, pulling, turning? Was the task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, restful or laborious?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690777988-282.png]]
367 |(% style="width:861px" %)Temporal demand - How much time pressure did you feel? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690778813-812.png]]
368 |(% style="width:861px" %)Effort - How hard did you work mentally and physically to accomplish your level of performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690779609-960.png]]
369 |(% style="width:861px" %)Performance - How successful did you feel in accomplishing the goals of the task? How satisfied were you with your performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690780664-359.png]]
370 |(% style="width:861px" %)Frustration level - How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, content, and relaxed did you feel during the task?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690781527-833.png]]
371 )))
372 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
373 (CL04) Trust (Post-Use Trust in Automation scale; Jian et al. 2000) IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO
374 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
375 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 376 |I would trust this robot system in future missions.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 377 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
378 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
379 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
380 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
381 )))
382
383
384
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 385 (% class="table-bordered" %)
386 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 387 == Template: Robot analyst ==
388 )))
389 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
390 **General: **
391
392 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: --Baseline --/ SYNERGISE-tech supported
393 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 394 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**PRE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 395 |(% style="width:296px" %)Baseline robot/ automation experience|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
396 |Statement
397 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 398 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation in my daily work (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 399
400 Write down which (optional)
401
402
403
404 )))
405 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 406 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation within the SYNERGISE project (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 407
408 Write down which (optional)
409
410
411
412 )))
413 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 414 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
415 (CL01) Safety Plan Confirmation
416 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
417 Mark chosen entry path on provided building map. //Sketch or describe entry path. (Sketch space)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 418
419
420
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 421
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 422
423 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 424 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL02) Situation Awareness (SAGAT; Endsley 1988):|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
425 List expected hazards and victims with details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Bullets and/ or sketch)//
426
427
428
429
430 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 431 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL04) Trust in automation (Baseline (% style="background-color:transparent" %)Scale of Trust in Automated Systems; Jian et al. 2000). |(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 432 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.3 433 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
434 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
435 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
436 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 437 )))
438 |(% colspan="2" style="width:445px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
439 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
440 (CL01) SafetyTeam Decision Appraisal:
441 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
442 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
443 |How could you rate the team's decisions during the mission (including the robot) in terms of safety and effectiveness?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
444 |Did your team correctly decide when to send the robot versus humans?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
445 )))
446 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
447 (CL01) Safety Error Reflection
448 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
449 List any mistakes or unsafe decisions you think occurred regarding robot deployment. //(Open question)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 450
451
452
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 453
454 )))
455 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
456 (CL02) Situation Awareness (Post-Scenario SAGAT)
457 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
458 Now that the mission is over, summarize the final floor layout, and list all hazards and victims found or confirmed. //(Sketch space and bullets)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 459
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 460
461
462
463 )))
464 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL03) Workload (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
465 |(% style="width:861px" %)Statement|(% style="width:305px" %)(((
466 Give a score between:
467
468 0 (very low) - 100 (very high)
469 )))
470 |(% style="width:861px" %)Mental demand - How much mental and perceptual activity was required - thinking, deciding, calculating, searching? Was the task easy or demanding, simple or complex, exacting or forgiving?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690776402-253.png]]
471 |(% style="width:861px" %)Physical demand - How much physical activity was required - pushing, pulling, turning? Was the task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, restful or laborious?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690777988-282.png]]
472 |(% style="width:861px" %)Temporal demand - How much time pressure did you feel? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690778813-812.png]]
473 |(% style="width:861px" %)Effort - How hard did you work mentally and physically to accomplish your level of performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690779609-960.png]]
474 |(% style="width:861px" %)Performance - How successful did you feel in accomplishing the goals of the task? How satisfied were you with your performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690780664-359.png]]
475 |(% style="width:861px" %)Frustration level - How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, content, and relaxed did you feel during the task?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690781527-833.png]]
476 )))
477 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
478 (CL04) Trust (Post-Use Trust in Automation scale; Jian et al. 2000)
479 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
480 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 481 |I would trust this robot system in future missions.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.1 482 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
483 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
484 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
485 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
486 )))
487
488
489
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.11 490 (% class="table-bordered" %)
491 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 492 == Template: Entry team member ==
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 493 )))
494 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
495 **General: **
496
497 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: Baseline / SYNERGISE-tech supported
498 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 499 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**PRE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 500 |(% style="width:296px" %)Baseline robot/ automation experience|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
501 |Statement
502 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 503 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation in my daily work (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 504
505 Write down which (optional)
506
507
508
509 )))
510 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 511 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation within the SYNERGISE project (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 512
513 Write down which (optional)
514
515
516
517 )))
518 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.4 519 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 520 (CL01) Safety Plan Confirmation
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 521 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 522 Mark chosen entry path on provided building map. //Sketch or describe entry path. (Sketch space)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 523
524
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 525
526
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 527
528 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 529 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL02) Situation Awareness (SAGAT; Endsley 1988):|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
530 List expected hazards and victims with details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Bullets and/ or sketch)//
531
532
533
534
535 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 536 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL04) Trust in automation (Baseline (% style="background-color:transparent" %)Scale of Trust in Automated Systems; Jian et al. 2000). IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
537 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 538 |I am confident in the robot analyst's capabilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 539 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
540 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
541 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
542 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.3 543 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 544 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 545 (CL01) Safety - Team Decision Appraisal:
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 546 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
547 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 22.1 548 |How would you rate the team's decisions during the mission (including the robot) in terms of safety and effectiveness?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 549 |Did your team correctly decide when to send the robot versus humans?|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 550 )))
551 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
552 (CL02) Situation Awareness Post Operation Recall
553 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 554 Describe the layout and list all hazards/victims that were found with details (e.g. location, gender, age, status). //(Sketch and describe)//
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 555
556
557
558
559
560 )))
561 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL03) Workload (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
562 |(% style="width:861px" %)Statement|(% style="width:305px" %)(((
563 Give a score between:
564
565 0 (very low) - 100 (very high)
566 )))
567 |(% style="width:861px" %)Mental demand - How much mental and perceptual activity was required - thinking, deciding, calculating, searching? Was the task easy or demanding, simple or complex, exacting or forgiving?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690776402-253.png]]
568 |(% style="width:861px" %)Physical demand - How much physical activity was required - pushing, pulling, turning? Was the task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, restful or laborious?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690777988-282.png]]
569 |(% style="width:861px" %)Temporal demand - How much time pressure did you feel? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690778813-812.png]]
570 |(% style="width:861px" %)Effort - How hard did you work mentally and physically to accomplish your level of performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690779609-960.png]]
571 |(% style="width:861px" %)Performance - How successful did you feel in accomplishing the goals of the task? How satisfied were you with your performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690780664-359.png]]
572 |(% style="width:861px" %)Frustration level - How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, content, and relaxed did you feel during the task?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690781527-833.png]]
573 )))
574 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
575 (CL04) Trust (Post-Use Trust in Automation scale; Jian et al. 2000) IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO
576 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
577 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 578 |I would trust this robot system in future missions.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.5 579 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
580 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
581 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
582 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
583 )))
584
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 585
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.2 586
587 (% class="table-bordered" %)
588 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.2 589 == Template: Base of Operations (LEMA) ==
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.2 590 )))
591 |(% colspan="2" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 592 **General: **
593
594 //Trial type/ Building/ scenario ID//: .................................  |  //Date/ Time//: .......................................  |  //Condition (encircle)//: Baseline / SYNERGISE-tech supported
595 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 27.1 596 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**RE-ENTRY PHASE (after briefing; before actual start of scenario)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 597 |(% style="width:296px" %)Baseline robot/ automation experience|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
598 |Statement
599 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 600 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation in my daily work (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 601
602 Write down which (optional)
603
604
605
606 )))
607 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 28.1 608 I have experience with robot(s)/ automation within the SYNERGISE project (encircle): Yes / No 
Rosa Van Tuijn 26.2 609
610 Write down which (optional)
611
612
613
614 )))
615 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.2 616 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL04) Trust in automation (Baseline (% style="background-color:transparent" %)Scale of Trust in Automated Systems; Jian et al. 2000). IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 23.2 617 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
618 |I am confident in the robot analyst's capabilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
619 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
620 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
621 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.2 622 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.3 623 |(% colspan="2" style="width:296px" %)**POST EXIT PHASE (hot wash)**
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 624 |(% style="width:296px" %)(((
625 (CL04) Trust (Post-Use Trust in Automation scale; Jian et al. 2000) IF SYNERGISE TECH SCENARIO
626 )))|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
627 |Statement|1 (LOW)|2|3|4|5|6|7 (HIGH)
628 |I would trust this robot system in future missions.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
629 |I am confident in the robot/system’s abilities.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
630 |The robot/system will act in our best interest.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
631 |The robot/system is reliable.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
632 |I trust the system’s information.|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐|☐
633 )))
634 |(% style="width:296px" %)(CL03) Workload (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988)|(% style="width:1053px" %)(((
635 |(% style="width:861px" %)Statement|(% style="width:305px" %)(((
636 Give a score between:
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.3 637
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 638 0 (very low) - 100 (very high)
639 )))
640 |(% style="width:861px" %)Mental demand - How much mental and perceptual activity was required - thinking, deciding, calculating, searching? Was the task easy or demanding, simple or complex, exacting or forgiving?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690776402-253.png]]
641 |(% style="width:861px" %)Physical demand - How much physical activity was required - pushing, pulling, turning? Was the task easy or demanding, slow or brisk, restful or laborious?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690777988-282.png]]
642 |(% style="width:861px" %)Temporal demand - How much time pressure did you feel? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690778813-812.png]]
643 |(% style="width:861px" %)Effort - How hard did you work mentally and physically to accomplish your level of performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690779609-960.png]]
644 |(% style="width:861px" %)Performance - How successful did you feel in accomplishing the goals of the task? How satisfied were you with your performance?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690780664-359.png]]
645 |(% style="width:861px" %)Frustration level - How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, content, and relaxed did you feel during the task?|(% style="width:305px" %)[[image:1776690781527-833.png]]
646 )))
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.3 647
Tjalling Haije 25.2 648 === Before humans enter a building/ hazard ===
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.3 649
Tjalling Haije 25.2 650 |**Claim**|**Measurement**|**What is recorded**|**Who records**
651 |CL01 Safety|Ground-truth safe paths|predefined safe/ suboptimal / unsafe paths|//Evaluation leader//
652 |(((
653 CL01 Safety
654 )))|(((
655 Chosen entry path
656 )))|(((
657 Intended entry path selection
658 )))|//Squad/ Team leader (informed by Robot analyst)//
659 |(((
660 CL02 Situation Awareness
661 )))|(((
662 Reported hazards, victims, layout (pre)
663 )))|(((
664 Sketch / map / description of interior
665 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team, Robot analyst (separately)//
666 |(((
667 CL02 SA
668 )))|(((
669 Robot‑based expectations
670 )))|(((
671 Expected hazards / victims from robot data
672 )))|//Robot analyst//
Tjalling Haije 25.6 673 |CL05 Trustworthy SA|Baseline trust (optional)|Initial trust in system/ robot|//Squad/ Team leader, Robot operator, Robot analyst//
Tjalling Haije 25.2 674 |(((
675 CL06 Health
676 )))|(((
677 Acceptable health ranges
678 )))|(((
679 HR, temp thresholds
680 )))|//Evaluation leader//
681 |(((
682 CL07 Efficiency
683 )))|(((
684 Mission start timestamp
685 )))|(((
686 End briefing → start
687 )))|//Evaluation leader//
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 688
Tjalling Haije 25.2 689 During humans/robots are inside building/ hazard
Rosa Van Tuijn 24.5 690
Tjalling Haije 25.2 691 |**Claim**|**Measurement**|**What is recorded**|**Who records**
692 |(((
693 CL01 Safety
694 )))|(((
695 Near‑incidents
696 )))|(((
697 Unsafe situations / close calls
698 )))|//Evaluation leader//
699 |(((
700 CL01 Safety
701 )))|(((
702 Hazard avoidance
703 )))|(((
704 Avoided predefined hazards
705 )))|//Evaluation leader//
706 |(((
707 CL02 SA
708 )))|(((
709 Executed path
710 )))|(((
711 Actual path taken
712 )))|//Evaluation leader, Engage system/ location sensors (?)//
713 |(((
714 CL02 SA
715 )))|(((
716 Path deviations
717 )))|(((
718 Deviations + cause (something for after instead?)
719 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team//
720 |(((
721 CL02 SA
722 )))|(((
723 Interpretations of robot images
724 )))|(((
725 ...?
726 )))|//Robot analyst (and Base or Operations/ LEMA ?)//
727 |(((
728 CL02 SA (Optional)
729 )))|(((
730 Robot control actions
731 )))|(((
732 Overrides, manual interventions
733 )))|//Robot operator//
734 |(((
735 CL06 Health
736 )))|(((
737 Threshold breach
738 )))|(((
739 Breach moment (HR, temp, stress (?))
740 )))|//Evaluation leader//
741 |(((
742 CL06 Health
743 )))|(((
744 Detection & intervention
745 )))|(((
746 Detection with corresponding action
747 )))|//Evaluation leader//
748 |(((
749 CL07 Efficiency
750 )))|(((
751 Entry timestamp
752 )))|(((
753 Entry team enters OR robot enters
754 )))|//Evaluation leader//
755 |(((
756 CL07 Efficiency
757 )))|(((
758 Exit timestamp
759 )))|Entry team exits OR robot exits |//Evaluation leader//
760
761 === After humans/robots exited building/hazard ===
762
763 |**Claim**|**Measurement**|**What is recorded**|**Who records**
764 |(((
Rosa Van Tuijn 19.9 765
Tjalling Haije 25.2 766
767 CL01 Safety
768 )))|(((
769
770
771 Decision quality (retro)
772 )))|(((
773
774
775 “How good were decisions?”
776 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team, Robot operator, Robot analyst, Baes of Operations/ LEMA//
777 |(((
778 CL01 Safety
779 )))|(((
780 Error reflection
781 )))|(((
782 Reflected unsafe choices
783 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Robot operator, Robot analyst//
784 |(((
Tjalling Haije 25.5 785 CL02 SA
Tjalling Haije 25.2 786 )))|(((
787 Reported hazards, victims, layout (post)
788 )))|(((
789 Sketch / map / description
790 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team, Robot analyst//
Tjalling Haije 25.5 791 |CL03 mission effectiveness|Decision and path quality|Route of FRs, decisions made.|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team, Robot analyst//
Tjalling Haije 25.2 792 |(((
Tjalling Haije 25.4 793 CL04 acceptable workload
Tjalling Haije 25.2 794 )))|(((
795 Workload
796 )))|(((
797 Short NASA‑TLX
798 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team, Robot operator, Robot analyst, Baes of Operations/ LEMA//
799 |(((
Tjalling Haije 25.4 800 CL05 Trustworthy SA
Tjalling Haije 25.2 801 )))|(((
802 Trust
803 )))|(((
804 Trust survey / interview
805 )))|//Squad/ Team leader, Entry team (?), Robot operator, Robot analyst, Baes of Operations/ LEMA//
806 |(((
807 CL06 Health
808 )))|(((
809 Health issue handling
810 )))|(((
811 Adequacy & timeliness
812 )))|//Evaluation leader (+ expert)//
813 |(((
814 CL07 Efficiency
815 )))|(((
816 Total mission duration
817 )))|(((
818 Start (end briefing) till end (?)
819 )))|//Evaluation leader//
820
821