Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2025/09/15 08:55
From version 9.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2025/07/08 14:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 11.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2025/09/15 08:55
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.RosaVanTuijn
1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije
Content
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
1 1  = 1. Introduction =
2 2  
3 -//<include a short summary of the claims to be tested, i.e., the effects of the functions in a specfic use case>//
4 -
5 5  This study evaluates the operational impact and user acceptance of two technological interventions in emergency response: (1) autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and (2) physiological and environmental sensor systems for monitoring first responder health. The primary claims tested are whether these technologies can enhance situational awareness, improve safety, and integrate seamlessly into existing workflows without overburdening personnel. The analysis focuses on stakeholder feedback from first responders, drone operators, and medics, emphasizing usability, trust, and coordination in high-stress environments.
6 6  
7 7  = 2. Method =
... ... @@ -73,4 +73,4 @@
73 73  
74 74  For the **drone system**, the challenge is to balance **technical sophistication with field usability**. Drones must be fast to deploy, easy to coordinate with human teams, and capable of operating independently without becoming a burden. Their integration into standard operating procedures—and the trust placed in their operators—will be critical to their acceptance.
75 75  
76 -Ultimately, both systems must be designed not just for functionality, but for **fit**: fit with the mission, the team, the environment, and the moment. When that fit is achieved, these technologies can move from being experimental tools to **trusted teammates** in the field.
74 +Ultimately, both systems must be designed not just for functionality, but for **fit**: fit with the mission, the team, the environment, and the moment. When that fit is achieved, these technologies can move from being experimental tools to **trusted tools **in the field.