Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/23 10:59
From version 1.3
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 10:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Mark Rinse van Koningsveld
on 2025/09/13 15:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.TjallingHaije
1 +XWiki.MarkVanKoningsveld
Content
... ... @@ -1,29 +1,26 @@
1 -| |**TDP2 Robots First, Then Humans Protocol**
2 -|**Visual**|[[image:1774262190622-968.png]]
3 -|**Description**|Robots explore first; humans enter only after safe passage is guaranteed. Robots and humans are working in an alternating fashion sweeping areas or floors for speed.
4 -|**Intent**|Reduce human exposure while maintaining tempo.
5 -|**Context**|Unknown or unsafe areas under time pressure.
6 -|**Problem**|Early entry increases risk; waiting blindly wastes time.
7 -|**Solution**|(((
8 -**Phase A: Robotic Recon** (autonomous/assisted) to map, detect hazards, propose ingress.
1 +**Summary.** Robots probe first; humans enter only after gates are met, robots and humans are switched out when sweeping areas or floors for speed.
9 9  
10 -**Go/No-Go gates** (e.g., coverage ≥ X%, hazards, ≥ Z viable routes).
3 +**Intent.** Reduce human exposure while maintaining tempo.
11 11  
12 -**Phase B: Human Entry** after a standardized Recon Brief; keep robotic overwatch.
13 -)))
14 -|**Roles**|Recon Operator; Analyst; Safety Officer; Entry Team Lead.
15 -|**Taks balance (Human vs Machine)**|(((
16 -**Human:** set objectives, interpret brief, decide go/no-go, choose route, manage risk.
5 +**Context.** Unknown or unsafe areas under time pressure.
17 17  
18 -**Machine:** run coverage sweeps, detect/label hazards, provide confidence
19 -)))
20 -|**Advantages**|(((
21 -* Increased situation awareness for first responder team (due to detailed information (videostream, audio, 3D map, etc.) from the robot.)
22 -* Improved safety for first responders (due to avoiding more hazards due to increased situation awareness of site interior.)
23 -* More effective decision making which resulted in positive outcomes (due to increased situation awareness.)
24 -)))
25 -|**Disadvantages**|(((
26 -* Risk of delay if robots struggle.
27 -* Potentially slower mission completion time due to robot being slower than human or dog.
28 -)))
29 -|**Related TDPs/IDPs**|TDP5, TDP6; IDP2.
7 +**Problem.** Early entry increases risk; waiting blindly wastes time.
8 +
9 +**Solution.**
10 +
11 +* **Phase A: Robotic Recon** (autonomous/assisted) to map, detect hazards, propose ingress.
12 +* **Go/No-Go gates** (e.g., coverage ≥ X%, hazards, ≥ Z viable routes).
13 +* **Phase B: Human Entry** after a standardized Recon Brief; keep robotic overwatch.
14 +
15 +**Roles.** Recon Operator; Analyst; Safety Officer; Entry Team Lead.
16 +
17 +**Handoffs.** Recon cell → Entry team via checklist brief; exceptions require Lead approval.
18 +
19 +**Task Balance — Human vs. Machine.**
20 +
21 +* **Human:** set objectives, interpret brief, decide go/no-go, choose route, manage risk.
22 +* **Machine:** run coverage sweeps, detect/label hazards, provide confidence
23 +
24 +**Consequences.** Lower exposure; clearer entry rationale; risk of delay if robots struggle.
25 +
26 +**Related.** TDP5, TDP6; IDP2.
1774262190622-968.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.TjallingHaije
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -9.9 KB
Content