Changes for page 1. Knowledge and Situation Awareness
Last modified by Mark Neerincx on 2025/09/08 07:01
From version 8.1
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2025/09/05 14:09
on 2025/09/05 14:09
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 10.1
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2025/09/05 14:10
on 2025/09/05 14:10
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ 33 33 |(% style="width:170px" %)Transactive Memory System (TMS) |(% style="width:639px" %)Distributed “who knows what” within teams to enable coordination and support specialized task performances|Explicit. Distributed. Stored. |Cognition |Marques-Quinteiro, P., Curral, L., Passos, A. M., & Lewis, K. (2013). And now what do we do? The role of transactive memory systems and task coordination in action teams. //Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice//, //17//(3), 194. 34 34 |Intuition|Unconscious intelligence based on years of experience that evolved to deal with uncertain and dynamic situations where logic and big data algorithms are of little benefit|Implicit. Often in the form of heuristics.|Perception, cognition, action|Gigerenzer, G. (2023). //The intelligence of intuition//. Cambridge University Press. 35 35 36 - 37 37 = Evaluation Methods = 38 38 39 39 Important **evaluation method**s are the following: ... ... @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ 42 42 * **Situation Present Assessment Method (SPAM)** measures SA by requiring participants to answer queries about the environment in real time. Team SPAM focuses on real-time queries to multiple team members to assess their collective awareness [5-7]. 43 43 * **Teamwork Situational Awareness Rating Technique (TSART)** is a subjective measure of distributed (team) situation awareness in which team members rate their awareness of other team members’ activities and intentions [8]. 44 44 45 -**Implications for SYNERGISE:** 46 46 45 += Implications for SYNERGISE: = 46 + 47 47 Enhancing SA is a primary claim for both our drone and sensor interventions. Participants acknowledged that tools like drones can indeed **enhance situation awareness and efficiency**, but **context matters**. In fast-paced scenarios, they favored minimal setup and real-time feeds for immediate SA, whereas in longer operations more detailed analysis was acceptable. Crucially, responders want technology to support their SA //without supplanting their judgment//. Maintaining **human oversight** of autonomous systems was deemed important so that the team’s situational understanding remains aligned with reality. 48 48 49 49 ----