Changes for page 1. Knowledge and Situation Awareness
Last modified by Mark Neerincx on 2025/09/08 07:01
From version 6.3
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2025/09/05 13:09
on 2025/09/05 13:09
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 4.3
edited by Mark Neerincx
on 2025/09/05 10:14
on 2025/09/05 10:14
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -1. Knowledge andSituation Awareness1 +1. Situation Awareness - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +3,3 @@ 1 -= **Situation Awareness** = 2 - 3 3 "Situation Awareness is the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning, and the projection of their status in the near future" (Endsley, 1995a, p. 36). Situation Awareness (SA) is critical in various domains, particularly in high-stakes environments like aviation, healthcare, and emergency response. It is subdivided into 3 levels of "awareness": 4 4 5 5 * ((( ... ... @@ -12,23 +12,12 @@ 12 12 **Level III SA is achieved when a trainee makes projections based on their understanding of Level I and Level II information.** Projection leads to predictions and decision-making about events or actions that may occur or be required in the near future. 13 13 ))) 14 14 15 -Endsley defines team SA as the degree to which each team member possesses the SA required for his or her responsibilities [1]. SA is vital to individual performance, and team (or shared)SA is critical to good team performance. Team members may have different subgoals in a given trauma resuscitation. **Team SA can be subdivided into 2 types: (1) shared SA, in which team members possess the same SA and (2) complimentary SA, which represents unique, specialty-specific SA necessary for good(combined)team performance** [ref id.] (Fig. 1). **Actionable SA** is realized by integrating SA-support with decision-support functionalities, so that actions can be initiated and guided efficiently and effectively (e.g., see ASSISTANCE's Chemical Hazard module that displays information about gas distributions, its current and predicted future states , with explicit affordances to set safe approach and evacuation routes [2].13 +Endsley defines team SA as the degree to which each team member possesses the SA required for his or her responsibilities [1]. SA is vital to individual performance, and team SA is critical to good team performance. Team members may have different subgoals in a given trauma resuscitation. **Team SA can be subdivided into 2 types: (1) shared SA, in which team members possess the same SA and (2) complimentary SA, which represents unique, specialty-specific SA necessary for good team performance** [ref id.] (Fig. 1). **Actionable SA** is realized by integrating SA-support with decision-support functionalities, so that actions can be initiated and guided efficiently and effectively (e.g., see ASSISTANCE's Chemical Hazard module that displays information about gas distributions, its current and predicted future states , with explicit affordances to set safe approach and evacuation routes [2]. 16 16 17 17 [[Figure 1. Shared Knowledge combined with Complimentary knowledge creates Total team situational awareness>>image:Situational awareness.jpg||alt="Shared knowledge combined with complimentary knowledge creates total team situational awareness" height="206" width="436"]] 18 18 17 +Important evaluation methods are the following: 19 19 20 -= Knowledge = 21 - 22 -How the environmental states are perceived, understood and predicted are determined by the experience and knowledge of the concerning team member. Humans develop and share **mental models** that support both the interpretation of situational conditions and the activation of appropriate behaviors and decisions. This can concern for example the spatial layout ("mental map") of an oil factory, its hazards ("explosive gases"), and the related fire operational procedures (ventilation closure, boundary cooling, ...). It should be noted that 23 - 24 - 25 -|=(% style="width: 170px;" %) Concept |=(% style="width: 639px;" %) Definition / Focus |= Knowledge Type |= Focus Area |= Key Recent Publication | 26 -|(% style="width:170px" %)(Shared) Mental Models|(% style="width:639px" %)Internal structures guiding understanding and action~-~--shared withing teams to coordinate and align behavior (e.g. in Human-Agent teams)|Individual or Shared |Cognition |Andrews et al. (2023): “The role of shared mental models in human‑AI teams| 27 -|(% style="width:170px" %)(Shared) Situation Awareness |(% style="width:639px" %)Perception, comprehension, projection of environment—shared across team members and agents |Activated (individual/shared) |Perception, cognition, action |Gao et al. (2023): “Agent Teaming Situation Awareness (ATSA)”| 28 -|(% style="width:170px" %)Transactive Memory System (TMS) |(% style="width:639px" %)Distributed “who knows what” within teams to enable coordination |Distributed |Cognition |Georgiadou (2024): Development of TMS in new venture teams| 29 - 30 -Important **evaluation method**s are the following: 31 - 32 32 * **Situational Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT)** is a widely used method by periodically freezing the test use case (e.g., a simulation) and querying participants about the status of the environment. There is also a version (Team SAGAT) for assessing shared situation awareness [3-5]. 33 33 * **Situation Present Assessment Method (SPAM)** measures SA by requiring participants to answer queries about the environment in real time. Team SPAM focuses on real-time queries to multiple team members to assess their collective awareness [5-7]. 34 34 * **Teamwork Situational Awareness Rating Technique (TSART)** is a subjective measure of distributed (team) situation awareness in which team members rate their awareness of other team members’ activities and intentions [8].
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.MarkNeerincx - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ik zou figuur1 eruit willen halen. Het is naar mijn idee goed om consistent een onderscheid te maken over de kennis die iemand bezit en de geactiveerde gesitueerde kennis ("situationeel bewustzijn"). tijdens de taakuitvoering. Het figuur zorgt voor wat verwarring. In de tekst is het goed verwoord. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2025-09-05 12:46:24.913