Skip to Content

h. Test SFT1

Version 1.9 by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/23 14:31

Experiment title
[Short, descriptive title]

2. Objective / Research Question
Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE Objectives without negative effects?

  1. Mission effectiveness
  2. Mission efficiency
  3. FR Health
  4. FR and victim safety

3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)
See the claims from UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR), being: 

  • CL01: Improve safety for responders
  • CL02: Increased SA
  • CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
  • CL04: acceptable workload
  • CL05: trustworthy SA
  • CL06: improved FR health
  • CL07: degraded mission efficiency

4. Scenario / Context
ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration

Preconditions from UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR) : 

  • Structure is flagged as (relatively?) safe for direct human entry; sector/ worksite allocated.
  • FRs wearables distributed, connected, and calibrated.
  • Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
    • ANYmal is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
    • C3I is online, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); 5G pods are installed for connection. 

5. Participants

  • FR team ROBOT:
    • 1x Squad leaders
    • 1x Robot operator 
    • 1x Robot analyst
    • 2x First responder
  • FR team HUMAN:
    • 1x Squad leaders
    • 2x First reponder 
  • Base of Operations:
    • 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
    • Team lead

Number of participants: 9 
 

6. System(s) Under Test

TechnologyDescription
ANYmal
  • Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes). 
  • Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
  • Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments. 
  • Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
  • Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map. 
  • NO autonomy.
C3I (BoO and tablet version)
  • Interoperability with health and location sensors. 
  • Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
  • Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
Health sensors
  • Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies). 
  • Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
  • Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems. 
  • Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring. 
Location sensors
  • Indoor and outdoor localisation capability. 
  • Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
  • Integration with C3I and mapping systems. 
  • Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences). 

7. Tasks

UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR) 

UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR) 
 

8. Experimental Conditions / Variants

Two buildings: 

  • Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
  • Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).

Trial 1: 

  • FR Team ROBOT does Building A
  • FR team HUMAN does Building B

Trial 2: 

  • FR Team ROBOT does Building B
  • FR team HUMAN does Building A

9. Measurements

See the measurements from UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR) 

10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)

  1. Preparation:
    1. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
    2. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
    3. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 
  2. Briefing:
    1. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
    2. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
  3. Execution:
    1. For FR team ROBOT, see: UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR) 
    2. For FR team HUMAN, see: UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR) 
    3. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
      1. Mission completion time
      2. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
      3. Time for tackling any health alerts
      4. Track FR path
  4. Hotwash:
    1. Questions on:
      1. Near-incident report
      2. Path inside
      3. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
      4. Mission effectiveness
      5. Self-reported workload
      6. Trust survey

11. Materials / Setup Components
[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]

13. Location & Duration

  • Location: [Where does it take place?]
  • Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]

14. Dependencies
[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]

15. Success Criteria
[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]