Skip to Content

Wiki source code of h. Test SFT1

Version 1.10 by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/23 14:57
Show last authors
1 **Experiment title**
2 [Short, descriptive title]
3
4
5 **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7
8 1. Mission effectiveness
9 1. Mission efficiency
10 1. FR Health
11 1. FR and victim safety
12
13
14 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
15 See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
16
17 * CL01: Improve safety for responders
18 * CL02: Increased SA
19 * CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
20 * CL04: acceptable workload
21 * CL05: trustworthy SA
22 * CL06: improved FR health
23 * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
24
25
26 **4. Scenario / Context**
27 ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
28
29 Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
30
31 * Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
32 * **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
33 * Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
34 ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
35 ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
36
37
38 **5. Participants**
39
40 * FR team ROBOT:
41 ** 1x Squad leaders
42 ** 1x Robot operator
43 ** 1x Robot analyst
44 ** 2x First responder
45 * FR team HUMAN:
46 ** 1x Squad leaders
47 ** 2x First reponder
48 * Base of Operations:
49 ** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
50 ** Team lead
51
52 Number of participants: 9 
53
54
55 **6. System(s) Under Test**
56
57 |(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
58 |(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
59 * Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
60 * Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
61 * Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
62 * Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
63 * Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
64 * NO autonomy.
65 )))
66 |(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
67 * Interoperability with health and location sensors.
68 * Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
69 * Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
70 )))
71 |(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
72 * Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
73 * Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
74 * Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
75 * Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
76 )))
77 |(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
78 * Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
79 * Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
80 * Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
81 * Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
82 )))
83
84
85
86 **7. Tasks**
87
88 [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
89
90 [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 
91
92
93 **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
94
95 Two buildings:
96
97 * Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
98 * Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
99 *
100
101 Trial 1:
102
103 * FR Team ROBOT does Building A
104 * FR team HUMAN does Building B
105
106 Trial 2:
107
108 * FR Team ROBOT does Building B
109 * FR team HUMAN does Building A
110
111
112 **9. Measurements**
113
114 See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
115
116
117 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
118
119 1. Preparation:
120 11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
121 11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
122 11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
123 1. Briefing:
124 11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
125 11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
126 1. Execution:
127 11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
128 11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
129 11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
130 111. Mission completion time
131 111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
132 111. Time for tackling any health alerts
133 111. Track FR path
134 1. Hotwash:
135 11. Questions on:
136 111. Near-incident report
137 111. Path inside
138 111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
139 111. Mission effectiveness
140 111. Self-reported workload
141 111. Trust survey
142
143 Planning:
144
145 |Step|Time
146 | |
147 | |
148
149
150
151
152 **~11. Materials / Setup Components**
153 [List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
154
155
156 **14. Dependencies**
157 [Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
158
159
160 **15. Success Criteria**
161 [How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
162
163
164