Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 2.4
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2026/03/24 16:16
on 2026/03/24 16:16
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.11
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 15:10
on 2026/03/23 15:10
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -h. Test SFT1 : System baseline test1 +h. Test SFT1 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. RosaVanTuijn1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ 1 1 **Experiment title** 2 -S ystembaseline test2 +[Short, descriptive title] 3 3 4 4 5 5 **2. Objective / Research Question** 6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 7 7 8 8 1. Mission effectiveness 9 9 1. Mission efficiency ... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 10 10 1. FR Health 11 11 1. FR and victim safety 12 12 13 + 13 13 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 14 14 See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 15 15 ... ... @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ 21 21 * CL06: improved FR health 22 22 * CL07: degraded mission efficiency 23 23 25 + 24 24 **4. Scenario / Context** 25 25 ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 26 26 ... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ 32 32 ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 33 33 ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 34 34 37 + 35 35 **5. Participants** 36 36 37 37 * FR team ROBOT: ... ... @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ 93 93 94 94 * Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 95 95 * Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 99 +* 96 96 97 97 Trial 1: 98 98 ... ... @@ -104,91 +104,24 @@ 104 104 * FR Team ROBOT does Building B 105 105 * FR team HUMAN does Building A 106 106 111 + 107 107 **9. Measurements** 108 108 109 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] .Compare outcomes between the two conditions teams if applicable.114 +See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 110 110 111 -|**Claim: Safety**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 112 -|Safer decision before entry|Safe path chosen|((( 113 -* Define ground-truth safe path(s) beforehand so that they can be compared to chosen entry path during the trial 114 -* Score paths beforehand: safe/ suboptimal/ unsafe 115 -))) 116 -|Better decision overall|"How good were you decisions looking back?"|((( 117 -* Hotwash reflection question (likert + open) 118 -* Observations of errors (e.g. near-incidents, unsafe choices) 119 -))) 120 -|Fewer dangerous situations|Near-incident reports|((( 121 -* Define hazards in buildings beforehand and check (with observations of during hotwash) if these hazards are avoided or not 122 -))) 123 123 124 -|**Claim: Efficiency**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 125 -|Faster mission execution|Total mission completion time|((( 126 -* Timestamp of start (after briefing) till all located victims have been extracted 127 -))) 128 -|Faster inside performance|First responder time inside|((( 129 -* Timestamp of entry building till exist building (last located victim is exstracted) 130 -))) 131 - 132 -|**Claim: Situation Awareness**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 133 -|Before entry |((( 134 -Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout 135 -)))|((( 136 -* Before entry let squad leader and entry team (seperatly) sketch/map or describe inside of building (harzards, victims, layout) > compare these with the ground-truth 137 - 138 -((( 139 - 140 -))) 141 -))) 142 -|During entry|((( 143 -FR path logs 144 -)))|((( 145 -* Compare plannend vs. executed path (how many or how big were the deviations? and were they acceptable?) and identify detours caused by misjudgment or new information 146 - 147 -((( 148 - 149 -))) 150 -))) 151 -|After mission|((( 152 -Correctness of reported hazards, victims, layout 153 -)))|((( 154 -* Repeat sketching/mapping or descriptive task and compare the outcomes (improvement/ deterioration vs pre-entry) 155 -))) 156 - 157 -|**Claim: Health**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 158 -|((( 159 -Health remains acceptable 160 -)))|((( 161 - 162 - 163 -Health indicators 164 -)))|((( 165 -* Define acceptable ranges (e.g. HR, temperature, etc.) beforehand and log these parapeter ranges 166 -))) 167 -|((( 168 -Issues handled in time 169 -)))|((( 170 - 171 - 172 -Health issues tackled in acceptable time 173 -)))|((( 174 -* Log when 175 -))) 176 - 177 - 178 - 179 179 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 180 180 181 -1. __Teampreparation__:119 +1. Team training: 182 182 11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 183 183 11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 184 184 11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 185 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!) 186 -1. __Experiment preparation:__ 123 +1. Usecase preparation 187 187 11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc. 188 -1. __Briefing:__125 +1. Briefing: 189 189 11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 190 190 11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 191 -1. __Execution:__128 +1. Execution: 192 192 11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 193 193 11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 194 194 11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: ... ... @@ -196,64 +196,47 @@ 196 196 111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 197 197 111. Time for tackling any health alerts 198 198 111. Track FR path 199 -1. __Hotwash__:200 -11. Questions (specified per role, couple questions per topic) on:136 +1. Hotwash: 137 +11. Questions on: 201 201 111. Near-incident report 202 202 111. Path inside 203 203 111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 204 -111. Mission effectiveness : e.g. self reported effectiveness of decisions141 +111. Mission effectiveness 205 205 111. Self-reported workload 206 206 111. Trust survey 207 -11. Group discussion with feedback 208 208 209 - **~11.Planning:**145 +Planning: 210 210 211 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.147 +* Team training: Day before. 1 hour. 212 212 * Trial 1: 213 -** Setup s cenario: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30149 +** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 214 214 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 215 215 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30 216 216 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30 217 217 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00 218 -** Scenarioreset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00154 +** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00 219 219 * Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15 220 220 * Trial 2: 221 -** (Setup scenario: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00)157 +** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 222 222 ** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 223 223 ** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00 224 224 ** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00 225 225 ** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30 226 -* Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30 162 +** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30 227 227 228 228 229 229 230 -**12. Materials** 231 231 232 -* For FRs: 233 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking 234 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare) 235 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I 236 -** 4x Health sensors 237 -** 4x Location sensors 238 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO). 239 -* For usecase: 240 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?) 241 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc. 242 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims. 243 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires 167 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components** 168 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 244 244 245 -**13. Dependencies** 246 246 247 -* Availability of materials 248 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings 249 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO. 250 -* Availability of: 251 -** Experiment participants 252 -** People willing to play victim 253 -** Experiment leaders 171 +**14. Dependencies** 172 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 254 254 255 -**14. Success Criteria** 256 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics. 257 257 175 +**15. Success Criteria** 176 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 258 258 178 + 259 259