Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 2.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2026/03/24 15:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.8
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
1 +h. Test SFT1
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.RosaVanTuijn
1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije
Content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
1 1  **Experiment title**
2 -System baseline test
2 +[Short, descriptive title]
3 3  
4 4  
5 5  **2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects?
7 7  
8 8  1. Mission effectiveness
9 9  1. Mission efficiency
... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
10 10  1. FR Health
11 11  1. FR and victim safety
12 12  
13 +
13 13  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 14  See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
15 15  
... ... @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
21 21  * CL06: improved FR health
22 22  * CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23 23  
25 +
24 24  **4. Scenario / Context**
25 25  ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
26 26  
... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
32 32  ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 33  ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34 34  
37 +
35 35  **5. Participants**
36 36  
37 37  * FR team ROBOT:
... ... @@ -104,36 +104,22 @@
104 104  * FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 105  * FR team HUMAN does Building A
106 106  
110 +
107 107  **9. Measurements**
108 108  
109 109  See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
110 110  
111 -|**Claim: Saftey**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test **
112 -|Safer decision before entry|Safe path chosen|(((
113 -* Define ground-truth safe path(s) beforehand so that they can be compared to chosen entry path during the trial
114 -* Score paths beforehand: safe/ suboptimal/ unsafe
115 -)))
116 -|Better decision overall|"How good were you decisions looking back?"|(((
117 -* Hotwash reflection question (likert + open)
118 -*
119 -)))
120 -| | |
121 121  
122 -
123 -
124 124  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
125 125  
126 -1. __Team preparation__:
118 +1. Preparation:
127 127  11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
128 128  11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
129 129  11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
130 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
131 -1. __Experiment preparation:__
132 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
133 -1. __Briefing:__
122 +1. Briefing:
134 134  11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
135 135  11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
136 -1. __Execution:__
125 +1. Execution:
137 137  11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
138 138  11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
139 139  11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
... ... @@ -141,64 +141,40 @@
141 141  111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
142 142  111. Time for tackling any health alerts
143 143  111. Track FR path
144 -1. __Hotwash__:
145 -11. Questions (specified per role, couple questions per topic) on:
133 +1. Hotwash:
134 +11. Questions on:
146 146  111. Near-incident report
147 147  111. Path inside
148 148  111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
149 -111. Mission effectiveness: e.g. self reported effectiveness of decisions
138 +111. Mission effectiveness
150 150  111. Self-reported workload
151 151  111. Trust survey
152 -11. Group discussion with feedback
153 153  
154 -**~11. Planning:**
155 155  
156 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
157 -* Trial 1:
158 -** Setup scenario: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
159 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
160 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
161 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
162 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
163 -** Scenario reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
164 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
165 -* Trial 2: 
166 -** (Setup scenario: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00)
167 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
168 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
169 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
170 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
171 -* Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
143 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
144 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
172 172  
173 173  
147 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
174 174  
175 -**12. Materials**
149 +* Risks: [Describe]
150 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
151 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
152 +* Data handling: [Describe]
176 176  
177 -* For FRs:
178 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
179 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
180 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
181 -** 4x Health sensors
182 -** 4x Location sensors
183 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
184 -* For usecase:
185 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
186 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
187 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
188 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
189 189  
190 -**13. Dependencies**
155 +**13. Location & Duration**
191 191  
192 -* Availability of materials
193 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
194 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
195 -* Availability of:
196 -** Experiment participants
197 -** People willing to play victim
198 -** Experiment leaders
157 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
158 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
199 199  
200 -**14. Success Criteria**
201 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
202 202  
161 +**14. Dependencies**
162 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
203 203  
164 +
165 +**15. Success Criteria**
166 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
167 +
168 +
204 204