Changes for page h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 2.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2026/03/24 15:44
on 2026/03/24 15:44
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.7
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 14:15
on 2026/03/23 14:15
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -h. Test SFT1 : System baseline test1 +h. Test SFT1 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. RosaVanTuijn1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ 1 1 **Experiment title** 2 -S ystembaseline test2 +[Short, descriptive title] 3 3 4 4 5 5 **2. Objective / Research Question** 6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?6 +Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the below SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] without negative effects? 7 7 8 8 1. Mission effectiveness 9 9 1. Mission efficiency ... ... @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 10 10 1. FR Health 11 11 1. FR and victim safety 12 12 13 + 13 13 **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)** 14 14 See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being: 15 15 ... ... @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ 21 21 * CL06: improved FR health 22 22 * CL07: degraded mission efficiency 23 23 25 + 24 24 **4. Scenario / Context** 25 25 ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration 26 26 ... ... @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ 32 32 ** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked). 33 33 ** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection. 34 34 37 + 35 35 **5. Participants** 36 36 37 37 * FR team ROBOT: ... ... @@ -91,114 +91,59 @@ 91 91 92 92 Two buildings: 93 93 94 -* Building A: Easierlocation, obstacles and environmental conditions.(clearvisibility,..)95 -* Building B: Challenginglocation, obstacles and environmental conditionsforhumansand robots(e.g.smoke and obstacles).97 +* Building A: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles). 98 +* Building B: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..) 96 96 97 -Trial 1: 98 98 99 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A 100 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B 101 101 102 -Trial 2:102 +Trial1: 103 103 104 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B 105 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A 104 +* FR Team ROBOT does easy 106 106 107 - **9.Measurements**106 +Team A does first [[UC04.3>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 108 108 109 - See the measurements from[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor explorationwithANYMAL(USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. UseCases.UC04\.0\: Detailedindoorexploration.UC04\.3\:Detailedindoorexploration withANYMAL(USAR).WebHome]]108 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.] 110 110 111 -|**Claim: Saftey**|**Measurment(s)**|**How to test ** 112 -|Safer decision before entry|Safe path chosen|((( 113 -* Define ground-truth safe path(s) beforehand so that they can be compared to chosen entry path during the trial 114 -* Score paths beforehand: safe/ suboptimal/ unsafe 115 -))) 116 -|Better decision overall|"How good were you decisions looking back?"|((( 117 -* Hotwash reflection question (likert + open) 118 -* 119 -))) 120 -| | | 121 121 111 +**9. Measurements** 122 122 113 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics] 114 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires] 115 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors] 123 123 117 + 124 124 **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)** 125 125 126 -1. __Team preparation__: 127 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I 128 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data. 129 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings. 130 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!) 131 -1. __Experiment preparation:__ 132 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc. 133 -1. __Briefing:__ 134 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards. 135 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation. 136 -1. __Execution:__ 137 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 138 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 139 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader: 140 -111. Mission completion time 141 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range 142 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts 143 -111. Track FR path 144 -1. __Hotwash__: 145 -11. Questions (specified per role, couple questions per topic) on: 146 -111. Near-incident report 147 -111. Path inside 148 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout 149 -111. Mission effectiveness: e.g. self reported effectiveness of decisions 150 -111. Self-reported workload 151 -111. Trust survey 152 -11. Group discussion with feedback 120 +1. [Describe preparation] 121 +1. [Briefing] 122 +1. [Execution] 123 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash] 153 153 154 -**~11. Planning:** 155 155 156 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour. 157 -* Trial 1: 158 -** Setup scenario: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 159 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30 160 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30 161 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30 162 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00 163 -** Scenario reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00 164 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15 165 -* Trial 2: 166 -** (Setup scenario: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00) 167 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00 168 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00 169 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00 170 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30 171 -* Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30 126 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components** 127 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets] 172 172 173 173 130 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations** 174 174 175 -**12. Materials** 132 +* Risks: [Describe] 133 +* Mitigations: [Describe] 134 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method] 135 +* Data handling: [Describe] 176 176 177 -* For FRs: 178 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking 179 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare) 180 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I 181 -** 4x Health sensors 182 -** 4x Location sensors 183 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO). 184 -* For usecase: 185 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?) 186 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc. 187 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims. 188 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires 189 189 190 -**13. Dependencies**138 +**13. Location & Duration** 191 191 192 -* Availability of materials 193 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings 194 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO. 195 -* Availability of: 196 -** Experiment participants 197 -** People willing to play victim 198 -** Experiment leaders 140 +* Location: [Where does it take place?] 141 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation] 199 199 200 -**14. Success Criteria** 201 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics. 202 202 144 +**14. Dependencies** 145 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions] 203 203 147 + 148 +**15. Success Criteria** 149 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?] 150 + 151 + 204 204