Skip to Content
Last modified by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/04/13 12:47
From version 1.18
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/24 09:19
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 13:21
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -h. Test SFT1: System baseline test
1 +h. Test SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -1,192 +3,69 @@
1 -**Experiment title**
2 -System baseline test
3 3  
4 4  
5 -**2. Objective / Research Question**
6 -Do the SYNERGISE technologies together improve the SYNERGISE [[Objectives>>2\. Specification.Objectives.WebHome]] (stated below) without negative effects?
7 7  
8 -1. Mission effectiveness
9 -1. Mission efficiency
10 -1. FR Health
11 -1. FR and victim safety
4 +**~1. Title of the Experiment**
5 +[Short, descriptive title]
12 12  
7 +**2. Objective / Research Question**
8 +[What are you trying to learn, test, or compare?]
9 +
13 13  **3. Hypotheses / Expectations (optional)**
14 -See the claims from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]], being:
11 +[If applicable, what do you expect to observe?]
15 15  
16 -* CL01: Improve safety for responders
17 -* CL02: Increased SA
18 -* CL03: Improved mission effectiveness
19 -* CL04: acceptable workload
20 -* CL05: trustworthy SA
21 -* CL06: improved FR health
22 -* CL07: degraded mission efficiency
23 -
24 24  **4. Scenario / Context**
25 -ASR3: Detailed indoor exploration
14 +[Short description of the operational or simulated scenario in which the experiment runs]
26 26  
27 -Preconditions from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] :
28 -
29 -* Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated.
30 -* **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated.
31 -* Specific to scenario with ANYmal:
32 -** **ANYmal **is mission-ready (battery, controls, and payload checked).
33 -** **C3I is online**, role-based views are configurated (Operator/ Analyst/ Team leader/ Safety officer); **5G pods** are installed for connection.
34 -
35 35  **5. Participants**
36 36  
37 -* FR team ROBOT:
38 -** 1x Squad leaders
39 -** 1x Robot operator
40 -** 1x Robot analyst
41 -** 2x First responder
42 -* FR team HUMAN:
43 -** 1x Squad leaders
44 -** 2x First reponder
45 -* Base of Operations:
46 -** 1x Safety officer / medical specialist
47 -** Team lead
18 +* Target group: [E.g., firefighters, police, SME observers]
19 +* Number of participants: [X]
20 +* Role(s) during the experiment: [Describe roles]
48 48  
49 -Number of participants: 9 
50 -
51 -
52 52  **6. System(s) Under Test**
53 53  
54 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Technology|(% style="width:1250px" %)Description
55 -|(% style="width:267px" %)ANYmal|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
56 -* Robust mobility over uneven terrain (stairs, debris, slopes).
57 -* Multi-sensor payload (video, LIDAR, thermal??)
58 -* Reliable wireless communication/ connection in degraded environments.
59 -* Support for tele‑operation with clear operator feedback.
60 -* Link with C3I, such as adding victims as pin on map.
61 -* NO autonomy.
62 -)))
63 -|(% style="width:267px" %)C3I (BoO and tablet version)|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
64 -* Interoperability with health and location sensors.
65 -* Robust operation under limited connectivity (sync when possible).
66 -* Usable tablet interface for field conditions (gloves, stress, time pressure).
67 -)))
68 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Health sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
69 -* Accurate and reliable physiological sensing (e.g. heart rate, exertion proxies).
70 -* Comfortable, non‑intrusive form factor suitable for long missions.
71 -* Secure wireless data transmission to C3I systems.
72 -* Real‑time alerting and trend monitoring.
73 -)))
74 -|(% style="width:267px" %)Location sensors|(% style="width:1250px" %)(((
75 -* Indoor and outdoor localisation capability.
76 -* Sufficient accuracy and update rate for safety‑critical use.
77 -* Integration with C3I and mapping systems.
78 -* Robustness to environmental interference (dust, debris, structures, height differences).
79 -)))
24 +* Hardware / robot / software: [Describe system(s)]
25 +* Version / configuration: [Describe]
26 +* Relevant capabilities and limitations: [Overview]
80 80  
81 -
82 -
83 83  **7. Tasks**
29 +[List the tasks participants must perform and their sequence]
84 84  
85 -[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
86 -
87 -[[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]] 
88 -
89 -
90 90  **8. Experimental Conditions / Variants**
32 +[Condition A vs B, baseline vs intervention, with/without transparency, etc.]
91 91  
92 -Two buildings:
93 -
94 -* Building A: Easier location, obstacles and environmental conditions. (clear visibility, ..)
95 -* Building B: Challenging location, obstacles and environmental conditions for humans and robots (e.g. smoke and obstacles).
96 -
97 -Trial 1:
98 -
99 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building A
100 -* FR team HUMAN does Building B
101 -
102 -Trial 2:
103 -
104 -* FR Team ROBOT does Building B
105 -* FR team HUMAN does Building A
106 -
107 107  **9. Measurements**
108 108  
109 -See the measurements from [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
36 +* Objective measures: [E.g., task completion time, errors, navigation metrics]
37 +* Subjective measures: [E.g., trust, workload, clarity, usability questionnaires]
38 +* Logs / sensors: [E.g., robot logs, video, physiological sensors]
110 110  
111 -
112 112  **10. Procedure (Step-by-Step)**
113 113  
114 -1. __Team preparation__:
115 -11. FR team ROBOT is trained in operating the robot, analysing the camera stream, and pinning information on C3I
116 -11. Squad leader and BoO are trained for both teams in interpreting the health and location sensor data.
117 -11. Experiment leader knows where hazards and victims are in both buildings.
118 -11. Anymal robot is tested with network in target buildings for experiment (without FR themselves seeing building!)
119 -1. __Experiment preparation:__
120 -11. Building is prepped with victims, hazards, etc.
121 -1. __Briefing:__
122 -11. Same for both teams for both building types: Building has been inspected from outside and is estimated safe for entry. Situation inside unknown. Victims possibly present. Goal: find, assess, and extract victims while avoiding and mapping hazards.
123 -11. One person is notified that their health sensor will be triggered during the Building B (difficult building) situation.
124 -1. __Execution:__
125 -11. For FR team ROBOT, see: [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
126 -11. For FR team HUMAN, see: [[UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYmal (USAR).WebHome]]
127 -11. During execution of both teams, performance will be measured by experiment leader:
128 -111. Mission completion time
129 -111. Health indicators stay within acceptable range
130 -111. Time for tackling any health alerts
131 -111. Track FR path
132 -1. __Hotwash__:
133 -11. Questions on:
134 -111. Near-incident report
135 -111. Path inside
136 -111. FR location and status of hazards, victims, and layout
137 -111. Mission effectiveness ? Decision Making effectiveness?
138 -111. Self-reported workload
139 -111. Trust survey
140 -11. Group discussion with feedback
42 +1. [Describe preparation]
43 +1. [Briefing]
44 +1. [Execution]
45 +1. [Debrief / Hotwash]
141 141  
142 -**~11. Planning:**
47 +**~11. Materials / Setup Components**
48 +[List equipment, environment layout, props, simulation assets]
143 143  
144 -* Team preparation: Day before. 1 hour.
145 -* Trial 1:
146 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
147 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 09:00 - 09:30
148 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 09:00 - 09:30
149 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 09:30 - 10:30
150 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 10:30-11:00
151 -** Usecase reset: test day 1. 10:30-11:00
152 -* Teams switch location: Test day 1. 11:00-11:15
153 -* Trial 2: 
154 -** Setup usecase: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
155 -** Setup tech and perform checks: Test day 1. 12:30 - 13:00
156 -** Briefing of each team individually (outside building): Test day 1: 12:30 - 13:00
157 -** Mission execution: Test day 1. 13:00 - 14:00
158 -** Hot wash: Test day 1. 14:00-14:30
159 -** Cleanup area and store tech. 14:00-14:30
50 +**12. Safety & Ethical Considerations**
160 160  
52 +* Risks: [Describe]
53 +* Mitigations: [Describe]
54 +* Informed consent: [Yes/No + method]
55 +* Data handling: [Describe]
161 161  
57 +**13. Location & Duration**
162 162  
163 -**12. Materials**
59 +* Location: [Where does it take place?]
60 +* Duration: [Total time per run + preparation]
164 164  
165 -* For FRs:
166 -** 1x Anymal with teleop setup and networking
167 -** 2x Tablet with C3I for squad leader (one spare)
168 -** 1x Base of Operations with computer with C3I
169 -** 4x Health sensors
170 -** 4x Location sensors
171 -** 8x walky talky with two channels (?) (for FR team and BoO).
172 -* For usecase:
173 -** 2x training building (~~100m2?)
174 -** Enviromental challenges: smoke machine, obstacles, etc.
175 -** ~~8x Actors or dummies for victims.
176 -* 8x Clipboards with papers and pens for hotwash and questionnaires
62 +**14. Dependencies**
63 +[Other WPs, required assets, system availability, permissions]
177 177  
178 -**13. Dependencies**
65 +**15. Success Criteria**
66 +[How do you know the experiment worked as intended?]
179 179  
180 -* Availability of materials
181 -* Availability and functioning of ANYmal robot with teleoperation and network in target buildings
182 -* Availability of functioning network between robot, FRs, and BoO.
183 -* Availability of:
184 -** Experiment participants
185 -** People willing to play victim
186 -** Experiment leaders
187 187  
188 -**14. Success Criteria**
189 -When mission(s) completed by both teams, and we can compare their performance using the metrics.
190 -
191 -
192 192