Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18

From version 3.3
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 14:05
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.16
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:16
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -k. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
1 +i. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -65,13 +65,7 @@
65 65  === 2. Incident 2 tech evaluation ===
66 66  
67 67  |(% style="width:247px" %)**Tech**|(% style="width:319px" %)**How was it used**|(% style="width:329px" %)**Issues**|(% style="width:329px" %)**Did it work sufficiently?**
68 -|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ASTRAL RTK Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.ASTRAL RTK Drone.WebHome]] (outdoor)|(% style="width:319px" %)Baseline & Run 1-3: The drone team conducts an aerial assessment of the collapsed buildings, identifying structural risks, access points, and possible victim locations. |(% style="width:329px" %)(((
69 -Run 1 USAR 1: Drone had connection issues which delayed its deployment.
70 -
71 -{{warning}}
72 -TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers
73 -{{/warning}}
74 -)))|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
68 +|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ASTRAL RTK Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.ASTRAL RTK Drone.WebHome]] (outdoor)|(% style="width:319px" %)Baseline & Run 1-3: The drone team conducts an aerial assessment of the collapsed buildings, identifying structural risks, access points, and possible victim locations. |(% style="width:329px" %)Run 1 USAR 1: Drone had connection issues which delayed its deployment.|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
75 75  |(% style="width:247px" %)[[OWL Indoor Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.OWL Indoor Drone.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)(((
76 76  Run 2 USAR 2: used to explore building and search for objects and victims
77 77  
... ... @@ -79,9 +79,7 @@
79 79  )))|(% style="width:329px" %)(((
80 80  Run 2 USAR 1: OWL missed victim and entire floor. Object detection initially disabled.
81 81  
82 -{{warning}}
83 -TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers
84 -{{/warning}}
76 +
85 85  )))|(% style="width:329px" %)Unreliable
86 86  |(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[Robot Arm (for ANYmal)>>Main.c\. Technology.Robot Arm (for ANYmal).WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)(((
87 87  Run 1 USAR 1: remove beam blocking door
... ... @@ -89,10 +89,8 @@
89 89  Run 3 USAR 1: Used to close a valve
90 90  
91 91  
92 -)))|(% style="width:329px" %){{warning}}TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers{{/warning}}(((
93 -
94 -)))|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
95 -|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[SNAKE>>Main.c\. Technology.SNAKE.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)Run 3 USAR 1: Used to search for victims in a narrow space|(% style="width:329px" %){{warning}}TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers{{/warning}}|(% style="width:329px" %)?
84 +)))|(% style="width:329px" %) |(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
85 +|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[SNAKE>>Main.c\. Technology.SNAKE.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)Run 3 USAR 1: Used to search for victims in a narrow space|(% style="width:329px" %) |(% style="width:329px" %)?
96 96  
97 97  === 3. Incident 2 way of working ===
98 98  
... ... @@ -100,14 +100,13 @@
100 100  |(% style="width:166px" %)Run 1, USAR team 1|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
101 101  The outdoor drone provides the Team Leader with an initial assessment of the incident scene. The Team Leader uses this information to deploy USAR teams and robotic assets; ANYmal supports by investigating and clearing hazards, after which the USAR teams gain access, stabilize the structure, locate victims, and perform rescues while continuously reporting progress to the Team Leader.
102 102  )))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 
103 -Although the robot didn't explore inside.
93 +Although the robot seems to have had a very limited role here and not have explored much.
104 104  |(% style="width:166px" %)Run 2, USAR team 2|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
105 105  The OWL indoor drone first explores the collapsed structure and streams its findings to the Team Leader. Based on this reconnaissance, the USAR team enters, searches for victims, responds to emergencies, and conducts rescues while the Team Leader maintains situational awareness through the digital support system.
106 106  )))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
107 107  |(% style="width:166px" %)Run 3, USAR team 1|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
108 108  The outdoor drone assesses the scene, SNAKE inspects the interior, and ANYmal handles hazardous intervention tasks. Using the information gathered by these robotic systems, the USAR team enters, locates victims, and performs the rescue while the Team Leader maintains overall situational awareness and coordination.
109 -)))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 
110 -Although the robot didn't explore inside.
99 +)))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
111 111  
112 112  == 4. Raw results ==
113 113  
... ... @@ -115,28 +115,23 @@
115 115  
116 116  Note: The measures are defined in [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]  and [[x. Measures>>3\. Evaluation.Measures.WebHome]]
117 117  
118 -|(% style="width:376px" %)**Measure**|(% style="width:225px" %)**Results**|**Connected Claim**|**Claim proven?**
119 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Safe path chosen|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
120 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision quality|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
121 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Near-incident and incident reports|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
122 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, based on robot intel before FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
123 -|(% style="width:376px" %)How optimal was the FR path|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
124 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, after FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
125 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Workload: e.g. NASA-TLX|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL03 improved mission effectiveness|
126 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Appropriate trust in technology: e.g. trust survey|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
127 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision confidence: e.g. Retrospective decision quality rating|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
128 -|(% style="width:376px" %)?|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL05 Trustworthy SA|
129 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Health indicators such as HR, temperature, etc.|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
130 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Health issues tackled in acceptable time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
131 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Total mission completion time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
132 -|(% style="width:376px" %)First responder time inside|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
107 +|(% style="width:406px" %)**Measure**|(% style="width:195px" %)**Results**|**Connected Claim**
108 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Safe path chosen|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders
109 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Decision quality|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders
110 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Near-incident and incident reports|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders
111 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, based on robot intel before FR entry|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL02 Increased SA
112 +|(% style="width:406px" %)How optimal was the FR path|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL02 Increased SA
113 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, after FR entry|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL02 Increased SA
114 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Workload: e.g. NASA-TLX|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL03 improved mission effectiveness
115 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Appropriate trust in technology: e.g. trust survey|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload
116 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Decision confidence: e.g. Retrospective decision quality rating|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload
117 +|(% style="width:406px" %)?|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL05 Trustworthy SA
118 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Health indicators such as HR, temperature, etc.|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health
119 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Health issues tackled in acceptable time|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health
120 +|(% style="width:406px" %)Total mission completion time|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency
121 +|(% style="width:406px" %)First responder time inside|(% style="width:195px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency
133 133  
134 -=== 5. Pros and cons for TDP ===
135 135  
136 -[[TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol>>2\. Specification.Requirements.TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol.WebHome]]
137 137  
138 -|**Pro / Con**|**Results**|**Pro / Con proven?**
139 -| | |
140 -| | |
141 141  
142 142