Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 2.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:41
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -i. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
1 +i. TDPs evaluation SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,9 @@
1 -== Approach ==
1 +Design patterns of interest:
2 2  
3 -The goal for the human-machine teaming framework is to (among others) develop human-machine teaming patterns that can be used to use technology
4 -
5 -**Design patterns of interest: **
6 -
7 7  * [[TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol>>2\. Specification.Requirements.TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol.WebHome]]
8 8  * [[IDP1 — Role-Based, Context-Specific Information Distribution>>2\. Specification.Requirements.IDP1 — Role-Based, Context-Specific Information Distribution.WebHome]]
9 9  
10 -**Approaches for evaluating DPs:**
6 +Approaches for evaluating DPs:
11 11  
12 12  1. Make new usecases based on how the FR actually did the TDP and IDP with the robots with claims and check those with the raw data.
13 13  1. Match the premade usecase [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] with the incident that fits best, and evaluate the claims for the TDP and IDP of interest using results from that incident.
... ... @@ -19,22 +19,9 @@
19 19  
20 20  Approach:
21 21  
22 -1. Figure out in which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
23 -1. Check if the tech worked as required (or good enough to be of value) in those incidents
24 -1. Figure out which of those incidents correspond most with [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
25 -1. Try to fill in [[j. SFT1 evaluation templates >>3\. Evaluation.SFT1.g\. Prototype .WebHome]]from the raw results, which
26 -1. Check for each of the claims the results for the connected measures > Evaluates UC
27 -1. Check for each of the pros/cons for the Design Pattern if they are validated > Evaluates Design Pattern
28 -1. Adjust the Design Patterns based on the results and/or their expected pros/cons.
29 -1. Update how the users should use the technology and/or the technology itself to achieve the objectives.
30 -1. Note missing data that should be included in the evaluation next time.
31 -
32 -== Design Patterns per Incident ==
33 -
34 -|**Incident**|**Design Pattern**
35 -| |
36 -| |
37 -| |
38 -| |
39 -
40 -
18 +* Figure out which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
19 +* Check if the tech worked as required (or good enough to be of value) in those incidents
20 +* Figure out which of those incidents correspond most with [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
21 +* Try to fill in [[j. SFT1 evaluation templates >>3\. Evaluation.SFT1.g\. Prototype .WebHome]]from the raw results, which
22 +* Check for each of the claims the results for the connected measures
23 +*