Changes for page k. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 2.19
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:22
on 2026/07/27 13:22
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 2.14
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:09
on 2026/07/27 13:09
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -104,28 +104,14 @@ 104 104 105 105 Note: The measures are defined in [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] and [[x. Measures>>3\. Evaluation.Measures.WebHome]] 106 106 107 -|(% style="width:376px" %)**Measure**|(% style="width:225px" %)**Results**|**Connected Claim**|**Claim proven?** 108 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Safe path chosen|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders | 109 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision quality|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders | 110 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Near-incident and incident reports|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders | 111 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, based on robot intel before FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA| 112 -|(% style="width:376px" %)How optimal was the FR path|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA| 113 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, after FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA| 114 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Workload: e.g. NASA-TLX|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL03 improved mission effectiveness| 115 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Appropriate trust in technology: e.g. trust survey|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload| 116 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision confidence: e.g. Retrospective decision quality rating|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload| 117 -|(% style="width:376px" %)?|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL05 Trustworthy SA| 118 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Health indicators such as HR, temperature, etc.|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health| 119 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Health issues tackled in acceptable time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health| 120 -|(% style="width:376px" %)Total mission completion time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency| 121 -|(% style="width:376px" %)First responder time inside|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency| 107 +|**Measure**|**Results**|**Connected Claim** 108 +|Safe path chosen| |CL01 Improve safety for responders 109 +|Decision quality| |CL01 Improve safety for responders 110 +|Near-incident and incident reports| |CL01 Improve safety for responders 111 +|Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness| |CL02 Increased SA 112 +| | | 122 122 123 -=== 5. Pros and cons for TDP === 124 124 125 -[[TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol>>2\. Specification.Requirements.TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol.WebHome]] 126 126 127 -|**Pro / Con**|**Results**|**Pro / Con proven?** 128 -| | | 129 -| | | 130 130 131 131