Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 2.13
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:05
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.21
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -i. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
1 +k. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -100,8 +100,32 @@
100 100  
101 101  == 4. Raw results ==
102 102  
103 -incident 2, run 1, USAR team 1
103 +**Results for Incident 2, Run 1, USAR team 1**
104 104  
105 +Note: The measures are defined in [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]  and [[x. Measures>>3\. Evaluation.Measures.WebHome]]
105 105  
107 +|(% style="width:376px" %)**Measure**|(% style="width:225px" %)**Results**|**Connected Claim**|**Claim proven?**
108 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Safe path chosen|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
109 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision quality|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
110 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Near-incident and incident reports|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
111 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, based on robot intel before FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
112 +|(% style="width:376px" %)How optimal was the FR path|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
113 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, after FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
114 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Workload: e.g. NASA-TLX|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL03 improved mission effectiveness|
115 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Appropriate trust in technology: e.g. trust survey|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
116 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision confidence: e.g. Retrospective decision quality rating|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
117 +|(% style="width:376px" %)?|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL05 Trustworthy SA|
118 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Health indicators such as HR, temperature, etc.|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
119 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Health issues tackled in acceptable time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
120 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Total mission completion time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
121 +|(% style="width:376px" %)First responder time inside|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
106 106  
123 +=== 5. Pros and cons for TDP ===
124 +
125 +[[TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol>>2\. Specification.Requirements.TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol.WebHome]]
126 +
127 +|**Pro / Con**|**Results**|**Pro / Con proven?**
128 +| | |
129 +| | |
130 +
107 107