Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 2.11
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:03
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 3.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 13:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -i. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
1 +k. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
29 29  1. Update how the users should use the technology and/or the technology itself to achieve the objectives.
30 30  1. Note missing data that should be included in the evaluation next time.
31 31  
32 -=== Design Patterns per Incident ===
32 +=== 1. Design Patterns per Incident ===
33 33  
34 34  |(% style="width:98px" %)**Incident**|(% style="width:396px" %)**Incident Description**|(% style="width:150px" %)**Tech used**|(% style="width:254px" %)**Design Patterns**
35 35  |(% style="width:98px" %)Incident 1|(% style="width:396px" %)(((
... ... @@ -62,10 +62,16 @@
62 62  
63 63  Based on the above list the next steps zoom in on incident 2.
64 64  
65 -=== Incident 2 tech evaluation ===
65 +=== 2. Incident 2 tech evaluation ===
66 66  
67 67  |(% style="width:247px" %)**Tech**|(% style="width:319px" %)**How was it used**|(% style="width:329px" %)**Issues**|(% style="width:329px" %)**Did it work sufficiently?**
68 -|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ASTRAL RTK Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.ASTRAL RTK Drone.WebHome]] (outdoor)|(% style="width:319px" %)Baseline & Run 1-3: The drone team conducts an aerial assessment of the collapsed buildings, identifying structural risks, access points, and possible victim locations. |(% style="width:329px" %)Run 1 USAR 1: Drone had connection issues which delayed its deployment.|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
68 +|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ASTRAL RTK Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.ASTRAL RTK Drone.WebHome]] (outdoor)|(% style="width:319px" %)Baseline & Run 1-3: The drone team conducts an aerial assessment of the collapsed buildings, identifying structural risks, access points, and possible victim locations. |(% style="width:329px" %)(((
69 +Run 1 USAR 1: Drone had connection issues which delayed its deployment.
70 +
71 +{{warning}}
72 +TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers
73 +{{/warning}}
74 +)))|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
69 69  |(% style="width:247px" %)[[OWL Indoor Drone>>Main.c\. Technology.OWL Indoor Drone.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)(((
70 70  Run 2 USAR 2: used to explore building and search for objects and victims
71 71  
... ... @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@
73 73  )))|(% style="width:329px" %)(((
74 74  Run 2 USAR 1: OWL missed victim and entire floor. Object detection initially disabled.
75 75  
76 -
82 +{{warning}}
83 +TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers
84 +{{/warning}}
77 77  )))|(% style="width:329px" %)Unreliable
78 78  |(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[Robot Arm (for ANYmal)>>Main.c\. Technology.Robot Arm (for ANYmal).WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)(((
79 79  Run 1 USAR 1: remove beam blocking door
... ... @@ -81,25 +81,54 @@
81 81  Run 3 USAR 1: Used to close a valve
82 82  
83 83  
84 -)))|(% style="width:329px" %) |(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
85 -|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[SNAKE>>Main.c\. Technology.SNAKE.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)Run 3 USAR 1: Used to search for victims in a narrow space|(% style="width:329px" %) |(% style="width:329px" %)?
92 +)))|(% style="width:329px" %){{warning}}TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers{{/warning}}(((
93 +
94 +)))|(% style="width:329px" %)Yes
95 +|(% style="width:247px" %)[[ANYmal Robot>>Main.c\. Technology.Humanoid Robot.WebHome]] with [[SNAKE>>Main.c\. Technology.SNAKE.WebHome]] |(% style="width:319px" %)Run 3 USAR 1: Used to search for victims in a narrow space|(% style="width:329px" %){{warning}}TODO: expand these issues with questionnaire answers{{/warning}}|(% style="width:329px" %)?
86 86  
87 -=== Incident 2 way of working ===
97 +=== 3. Incident 2 way of working ===
88 88  
89 -|(% style="width:138px" %)**Run & team**|(% style="width:470px" %)**Way of working**|(% style="width:238px" %)**Similar to what usecase**
90 -|(% style="width:138px" %)Run 1, USAR team 1|(% style="width:470px" %)(((
99 +|(% style="width:166px" %)**Run & team**|(% style="width:442px" %)**How did the first responders use the tech**|(% style="width:238px" %)**Similar to what usecase**
100 +|(% style="width:166px" %)Run 1, USAR team 1|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
91 91  The outdoor drone provides the Team Leader with an initial assessment of the incident scene. The Team Leader uses this information to deploy USAR teams and robotic assets; ANYmal supports by investigating and clearing hazards, after which the USAR teams gain access, stabilize the structure, locate victims, and perform rescues while continuously reporting progress to the Team Leader.
92 92  )))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 
93 -Although the robot seems to have had a very limited role here and not have explored much.
94 -|(% style="width:138px" %)Run 2, USAR team 2|(% style="width:470px" %)(((
103 +Although the robot didn't explore inside.
104 +|(% style="width:166px" %)Run 2, USAR team 2|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
95 95  The OWL indoor drone first explores the collapsed structure and streams its findings to the Team Leader. Based on this reconnaissance, the USAR team enters, searches for victims, responds to emergencies, and conducts rescues while the Team Leader maintains situational awareness through the digital support system.
96 96  )))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
97 -|(% style="width:138px" %)Run 3, USAR team 1|(% style="width:470px" %)(((
107 +|(% style="width:166px" %)Run 3, USAR team 1|(% style="width:442px" %)(((
98 98  The outdoor drone assesses the scene, SNAKE inspects the interior, and ANYmal handles hazardous intervention tasks. Using the information gathered by these robotic systems, the USAR team enters, locates victims, and performs the rescue while the Team Leader maintains overall situational awareness and coordination.
99 -)))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
109 +)))|(% style="width:238px" %)[[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]] 
110 +Although the robot didn't explore inside.
100 100  
112 +== 4. Raw results ==
101 101  
114 +**Results for Incident 2, Run 1, USAR team 1**
102 102  
116 +Note: The measures are defined in [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]  and [[x. Measures>>3\. Evaluation.Measures.WebHome]]
103 103  
118 +|(% style="width:376px" %)**Measure**|(% style="width:225px" %)**Results**|**Connected Claim**|**Claim proven?**
119 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Safe path chosen|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
120 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision quality|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
121 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Near-incident and incident reports|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL01 Improve safety for responders |
122 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, based on robot intel before FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
123 +|(% style="width:376px" %)How optimal was the FR path|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
124 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Reported hazards, victims, layout correctness, after FR entry|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL02 Increased SA|
125 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Workload: e.g. NASA-TLX|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL03 improved mission effectiveness|
126 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Appropriate trust in technology: e.g. trust survey|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
127 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Decision confidence: e.g. Retrospective decision quality rating|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL04 acceptable workload|
128 +|(% style="width:376px" %)?|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL05 Trustworthy SA|
129 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Health indicators such as HR, temperature, etc.|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
130 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Health issues tackled in acceptable time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL06 Improved FR health|
131 +|(% style="width:376px" %)Total mission completion time|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
132 +|(% style="width:376px" %)First responder time inside|(% style="width:225px" %) |CL07 Degraded mission efficiency|
104 104  
134 +=== 5. Pros and cons for TDP ===
135 +
136 +[[TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol>>2\. Specification.Requirements.TDP2 — Robots First, Then Humans Protocol.WebHome]]
137 +
138 +|**Pro / Con**|**Results**|**Pro / Con proven?**
139 +| | |
140 +| | |
141 +
105 105