Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 1.4
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:35
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -i. TDPs evaluation SFT1
1 +i. Design Patterns Evaluation SFT1
Content
... ... @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
15 15  
16 16  Approach:
17 17  
18 -1. Figure out which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
18 +1. Figure out in which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
19 19  1. Check if the tech worked as required (or good enough to be of value) in those incidents
20 20  1. Figure out which of those incidents correspond most with [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
21 21  1. Try to fill in [[j. SFT1 evaluation templates >>3\. Evaluation.SFT1.g\. Prototype .WebHome]]from the raw results, which
... ... @@ -24,3 +24,13 @@
24 24  1. Adjust the Design Patterns based on the results and/or their expected pros/cons.
25 25  1. Update how the users should use the technology and/or the technology itself to achieve the objectives.
26 26  1. Note missing data that should be included in the evaluation next time.
27 +
28 +== Design Patterns per Incident ==
29 +
30 +|**Incident**|**Design Pattern**
31 +| |
32 +| |
33 +| |
34 +| |
35 +
36 +