Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 16:18
From version 1.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:31
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.4
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:35
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -15,9 +15,12 @@
15 15  
16 16  Approach:
17 17  
18 -* Figure out which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
19 -* Check if the tech worked as required (or good enough to be of value) in those incidents
20 -* Figure out which of those incidents correspond most with [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
21 -* Try to fill in [[j. SFT1 evaluation templates >>3\. Evaluation.SFT1.g\. Prototype .WebHome]]from the raw results, which
22 -* Check for each of the claims the results for the connected measures > Evaluates UC
23 -* Check for each of the claims for the TDP / IDP if they are validated > Evaluates TDP/IDP
18 +1. Figure out which incidents TDP2 and IDP1 were used
19 +1. Check if the tech worked as required (or good enough to be of value) in those incidents
20 +1. Figure out which of those incidents correspond most with [[UC04.3: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR)>>2\. Specification.b\. Use Cases.UC04\.0\: Detailed indoor exploration.UC04\.3\: Detailed indoor exploration with ANYMAL (USAR).WebHome]]
21 +1. Try to fill in [[j. SFT1 evaluation templates >>3\. Evaluation.SFT1.g\. Prototype .WebHome]]from the raw results, which
22 +1. Check for each of the claims the results for the connected measures > Evaluates UC
23 +1. Check for each of the pros/cons for the Design Pattern if they are validated > Evaluates Design Pattern
24 +1. Adjust the Design Patterns based on the results and/or their expected pros/cons.
25 +1. Update how the users should use the technology and/or the technology itself to achieve the objectives.
26 +1. Note missing data that should be included in the evaluation next time.