Changes for page d. Test CFT2: Concept of Operations
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 10:05
From version 9.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2025/07/08 13:18
on 2025/07/08 13:18
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. RosaVanTuijn1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@ 1 1 = 1. Introduction = 2 2 3 -//<include a short summary of the claims to be tested, i.e., the effects of the functions in a specfic use case>// 4 - 5 5 During CFT2 the main goal was to discuss and validate our developed //Concept of Operations// (ConOps) with SYNERGISE partners. Having a clear ConOps is critical for understanding how the technology is envisioned to be used, and as a framework for designing suitable Team Design Patterns that aid the mission success. The technologies that are included in the current ConOps version are: outdoor drones (RTK drones), indoor drones (OWL), body sensors (location, health, gas), C3I/IMS, connection/ communication (5G), AR for improving the efficiency, and command and control support (XAI). The information gained during CFT2 will be used to iterate and expand the ConOps (including adding the remaining technologies, such as ANYmal) and iterate on the Team Design Patterns (TDPs). 6 6 7 7 The ConOps encompasses four stages (corresponding with the ASR levels): Arrival, Wide area assessment, Worksite assessment, and Worksite rescue. For each of these stages a set of use cases has been created that demonstrates how the first responders could work together with de SYNERGISE technologies to increase first responder safety and mission effectiveness. ... ... @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ 8 8 9 9 = 2. Method = 10 10 11 -Two sessions were conducted to evaluate the integration of new technologies in emergency response scenarios (zoomed different use cases within the mission: see the [[c.Prototype CFT2: Concept of Operations>>doc:3\. Evaluation.c\. Prototype .WebHome]]). Each session followed a structured format involving the presentation of use cases, participant feedback, and discussion. 9 +Two sessions were conducted to evaluate the integration of new technologies in emergency response scenarios (zoomed different use cases within the mission: see the [[c.Prototype CFT2: Concept of Operations>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT2.c\. Prototype .WebHome]]). Each session followed a structured format involving the presentation of use cases, participant feedback, and discussion. 12 12 13 13 == 2.1 Participants == 14 14