Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation

Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2025/09/15 08:03
From version 7.1
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2025/09/08 12:04
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 8.1
edited by Mark Rinse van Koningsveld
on 2025/09/13 15:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.TjallingHaije
1 +XWiki.MarkVanKoningsveld
Content
... ... @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
18 18  
19 19  The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and itegration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
20 20  
21 -=== CFT4: Human-Machine Teaming ===
21 +=== CFT4 and onwards: Human-Machine Teaming ===
22 22  
23 -....
23 +We now have usecases and claims made by following the SCE method. We can now test them in modules during CFT4 and duruing the coming IFT's (Integration Field Tests)
24 24  
25 25