Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation

Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2025/09/15 08:03
From version 4.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2025/08/25 11:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Rosa Van Tuijn
on 2025/08/25 11:30
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
5 5  This evaluation chapter will present all prototypes created for the HMT framework, accompanied by their corresponding CFT tests. Prototype documentation illustrates the concepts and principles of HMT, while test reports detail interactions with users and summarize the results obtained.
6 6  
7 7  
8 -== CFT1: Data visualisation ==
8 +== CFT1: Data visualisation ==
9 9  
10 10  This first CFT evaluated how sensor data - specifically health, location, and communication data - can support decision-making in USAR operations at tactical and operational levels. Twelve participants from various roles completed questionnaires assessing their data needs and preference for [[visualization formats>>doc:.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The [[study found>>doc:.b\. Test.WebHome]] that different roles require different types and levels of data detail: tactical users prefer aggregated overviews, while operational users need real-time, detailed information.
11 11  
... ... @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
15 15  
16 16  == CFT3: Two Detailed Use Cases ==
17 17  
18 +The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and itegration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
18 18  
19 19  == CFT4: Human-Machine Teaming ==
20 20