Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation

Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 10:06
From version 10.6
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:06
Change comment: Renamed back-links.
To version 10.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:03
Change comment: Renamed back-links.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
8 8  
9 9  === CFT1: Data Visualisation ===
10 10  
11 -This first CFT evaluated how sensor data - specifically health, location, and communication data - can support decision-making in USAR operations at tactical and operational levels. Questionnaires were used to determine users' data needs and preferences for [[visualization formats>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT1.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The [[study found>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT1.b\. Test.WebHome]] that different roles require different types and levels of data detail: tactical users prefer aggregated overviews, while operational users need real-time, detailed information.
11 +This first CFT evaluated how sensor data - specifically health, location, and communication data - can support decision-making in USAR operations at tactical and operational levels. Questionnaires were used to determine users' data needs and preferences for [[visualization formats>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT1.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The [[study found>>doc:.b\. Test.WebHome]] that different roles require different types and levels of data detail: tactical users prefer aggregated overviews, while operational users need real-time, detailed information.
12 12  
13 13  === CFT2: Concept of Operations ===
14 14  
15 -During the second CFT the Concept of Operations (ConOps) was evaluated. Through[[ structured sessions>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT2.d\. Test.WebHome]] involving presentations of multiple[[ use cases>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT2.c\. Prototype .WebHome]] and participant feedback, the study explored operational feasibility, safetly, and team dynamics. [[Key findings>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT2.d\. Test.WebHome]] highlighted the importance of context in technology deployment, the need for rapid and logical task distribution, and the critical role of human oversight.
15 +During the second CFT the Concept of Operations (ConOps) was evaluated. Through[[ structured sessions>>doc:.d\. Test.WebHome]] involving presentations of multiple[[ use cases>>doc:.c\. Prototype .WebHome]] and participant feedback, the study explored operational feasibility, safetly, and team dynamics. [[Key findings>>doc:.d\. Test.WebHome]] highlighted the importance of context in technology deployment, the need for rapid and logical task distribution, and the critical role of human oversight.
16 16  
17 17  === CFT3: Two Detailed Use Cases ===
18 18  
19 -The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT3.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and integration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
19 +The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and integration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
20 20  
21 21  === CFT4 and onwards: Human-Machine Teaming ===
22 22