Skip to Content

Changes for page 3. Evaluation

Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/07/27 10:06
From version 10.2
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/07/27 10:03
Change comment: Renamed back-links.
To version 8.1
edited by Mark Rinse van Koningsveld
on 2025/09/13 15:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.TjallingHaije
1 +XWiki.MarkVanKoningsveld
Content
... ... @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
8 8  
9 9  === CFT1: Data Visualisation ===
10 10  
11 -This first CFT evaluated how sensor data - specifically health, location, and communication data - can support decision-making in USAR operations at tactical and operational levels. Questionnaires were used to determine users' data needs and preferences for [[visualization formats>>doc:3\. Evaluation.CFT1.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The [[study found>>doc:.b\. Test.WebHome]] that different roles require different types and levels of data detail: tactical users prefer aggregated overviews, while operational users need real-time, detailed information.
11 +This first CFT evaluated how sensor data - specifically health, location, and communication data - can support decision-making in USAR operations at tactical and operational levels. Questionnaires were used to determine users' data needs and preferences for [[visualization formats>>doc:.a\. Prototype.WebHome]]. The [[study found>>doc:.b\. Test.WebHome]] that different roles require different types and levels of data detail: tactical users prefer aggregated overviews, while operational users need real-time, detailed information.
12 12  
13 13  === CFT2: Concept of Operations ===
14 14  
... ... @@ -16,10 +16,10 @@
16 16  
17 17  === CFT3: Two Detailed Use Cases ===
18 18  
19 -The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and integration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
19 +The third CFT, evaluated [[two use cases>>doc:.e\. Prototype .WebHome]]: autonomous indoor drones for victim detection and physiological/ environmental sensors for monitoring first responder health. The study assessed usability, trust, and itegration into emergency workflows through structured sessions with firefighters, USAR personnel, and drone pilots. [[Key findings highlight>>doc:.f\. Test.WebHome]] that while both technologies show promise, their success depends on seamless integration into operational proces, respecting roles, protocols, and situational constraints to become trusted tools in the field.
20 20  
21 21  === CFT4 and onwards: Human-Machine Teaming ===
22 22  
23 -In total four usecases with claims regarding their human-machine teamwork have been developed using the SCE method. During the upcoming CFT4 the human-machine teaming with a number of additional technologies such as the AnyMAL and snake robot will be explored further, as well as iterating over all usecase during the coming IFT's (Integration Field Tests).
23 +We now have usecases and claims made by following the SCE method. We can now test them in modules during CFT4 and duruing the coming IFT's (Integration Field Tests)
24 24  
25 25