Wiki source code of UC04.4: Detailed indoor exploration without ANYMAL (USAR)
Version 29.1 by Rosa Van Tuijn on 2026/03/25 10:37
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |=**Objective**|= | ||
| 2 | |=Description|=((( | ||
| 3 | Baseline usecase with current way of working for entering a building and extraction victims, augmented with health and location sensors of first-responders for BoO. | ||
| 4 | ))) | ||
| 5 | |**TDP**|2c: IDP "role-based, context-specific views", | ||
| 6 | |**IDP**| | ||
| 7 | |**Actors**|Team leader, Safety officer (at HQ), Entry Team (FRs) (described at [[4. Personas & Problem Scenarios>>path:/bin/view/Main/sdf/4.%20Scenarios%20%26%20Personas/]] and [[Direct Stakeholders>>path:/bin/view/Main/sdf/Stakeholders/Direct/]]) | ||
| 8 | |**Pre-Condition**|((( | ||
| 9 | * Structure is flagged as (relatively?) **safe for direct human entry**; sector/ worksite allocated. Viable entrance identified. | ||
| 10 | * **FRs wearables** distributed, connected, and calibrated. | ||
| 11 | ))) | ||
| 12 | |**Post-Condition**|((( | ||
| 13 | * Health alerts handled; intervention performed if needed. | ||
| 14 | ))) | ||
| 15 | |**Status**|Hazards marked and/or victims detected; team proceeds with increased safety. | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | === **Action Sequence** === | ||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | ===== 1. Deployment, Startup and decision making ===== | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | * a. **Squad leader **receives building status (safe enough for human entry) + safe viable openings. | ||
| 22 | * b. **Comms/network check**: verify stable uplink for wearable streams between worksite and base of operations via walky-talky. | ||
| 23 | * c. Squad leader selects an **entry decision** (go / no-go / partial entry) and makes decisions regarding: entry team composition, route, objectives, time limits, and abort criteria. The decision is communicated with the **BoO.** | ||
| 24 | * d. **First responders** check and calibrate wearable sensors (health + localization); the squad leader confirms **team baseline status** are “green/ready” on the squad dashboard; **base of operations** sees the same status across all teams. | ||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | ===== 2. Indoor Exploration with two **first responders** ===== | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | * a. **First responders** enter as pair via the safest viable opening; wearables are used for **continuous tracking** (location + vitals) and display their status and location on the C3I of the **BoO**. | ||
| 29 | * b. **First responders** explores building and provide updates to **squad leader** via walky-talky, locating **blocked corridors, collapse risk, gas/smoke pockets, heat zones, viable routes, possible victims.** | ||
| 30 | * c. **Squad leader **monitors state of mission, and communicates progress back to the **BoO. ** | ||
| 31 | * d. **Someone **notes the encountered dangers (in a form?) from inside the building? | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | 4. Victim extraction | ||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | * a. **Squad leader** decides when to transition to victim extraction and in what order, route, etc. | ||
| 36 | * b. **First responders **extract the victims. | ||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | ===== 3. Remote Monitoring, Alerts, and Coordinated Escalation ===== | ||
| 39 | |||
| 40 | * a. **Base of operations** monitors the squads active in the operation via C3I and health monitoring and location; squad leader monitors his own team and receives health/location updates from BoO via walky-talky. | ||
| 41 | * b. If a responder crosses a threshold (e.g., heart rate spike, heat stress indicator, immobility, rapid elevation change, loss of signal), an **alert** is generated simultaneously: Base of operations receives the same alert in the multi-team view (for cross-team support decisions), and communicates this via walky-talky to the **squad leader**. | ||
| 42 | * c. **Escalation policy (two-level response)**: 1) **Squad leader action**: immediate check-in (voice), buddy-check instruction, micro-reroute to nearest safe point / egress, or pause task. 2) **Base of operations action**: dispatch medical support / reallocate teams / request additional sensing (robot reposition, drone overwatch), and initiate comms contingency if signal degradation persists. | ||
| 43 | * d. If readings normalize, event is closed with a short note; if abnormal readings persist, the squad leader executes abort criteria (partial withdrawal / full extraction) while base coordinates site-level support and deconfliction with other teams. | ||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | (% class="box warningmessage" %) | ||
| 48 | ((( | ||
| 49 | The above action sequence needs to be checked by a domain expert for validity | ||
| 50 | ))) | ||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | |=Claims (title)|=Function|=Effect(s)|=Action Sequence Step(s) | ||
| 53 | |=(% colspan="4" scope="col" %)No seperate claims for this usecase. Instead focus on doing questionnaires etc to compare with the ANYMAL version. |