Skip to Content
Last modified by Tjalling Haije on 2026/03/23 10:59
From version 1.1
edited by Mark Rinse van Koningsveld
on 2025/09/13 15:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 1.3
edited by Tjalling Haije
on 2026/03/23 10:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.MarkVanKoningsveld
1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije
Content
... ... @@ -1,26 +1,29 @@
1 -**Summary.** Robots probe first; humans enter only after gates are met, robots and humans are switched out when sweeping areas or floors for speed.
1 +| |**TDP2 Robots First, Then Humans Protocol**
2 +|**Visual**|[[image:1774262190622-968.png]]
3 +|**Description**|Robots explore first; humans enter only after safe passage is guaranteed. Robots and humans are working in an alternating fashion sweeping areas or floors for speed.
4 +|**Intent**|Reduce human exposure while maintaining tempo.
5 +|**Context**|Unknown or unsafe areas under time pressure.
6 +|**Problem**|Early entry increases risk; waiting blindly wastes time.
7 +|**Solution**|(((
8 +**Phase A: Robotic Recon** (autonomous/assisted) to map, detect hazards, propose ingress.
2 2  
3 -**Intent.** Reduce human exposure while maintaining tempo.
10 +**Go/No-Go gates** (e.g., coverage ≥ X%, hazards, ≥ Z viable routes).
4 4  
5 -**Context.** Unknown or unsafe areas under time pressure.
12 +**Phase B: Human Entry** after a standardized Recon Brief; keep robotic overwatch.
13 +)))
14 +|**Roles**|Recon Operator; Analyst; Safety Officer; Entry Team Lead.
15 +|**Taks balance (Human vs Machine)**|(((
16 +**Human:** set objectives, interpret brief, decide go/no-go, choose route, manage risk.
6 6  
7 -**Problem.** Early entry increases risk; waiting blindly wastes time.
8 -
9 -**Solution.**
10 -
11 -* **Phase A: Robotic Recon** (autonomous/assisted) to map, detect hazards, propose ingress.
12 -* **Go/No-Go gates** (e.g., coverage ≥ X%, hazards, ≥ Z viable routes).
13 -* **Phase B: Human Entry** after a standardized Recon Brief; keep robotic overwatch.
14 -
15 -**Roles.** Recon Operator; Analyst; Safety Officer; Entry Team Lead.
16 -
17 -**Handoffs.** Recon cell → Entry team via checklist brief; exceptions require Lead approval.
18 -
19 -**Task Balance — Human vs. Machine.**
20 -
21 -* **Human:** set objectives, interpret brief, decide go/no-go, choose route, manage risk.
22 -* **Machine:** run coverage sweeps, detect/label hazards, provide confidence
23 -
24 -**Consequences.** Lower exposure; clearer entry rationale; risk of delay if robots struggle.
25 -
26 -**Related.** TDP5, TDP6; IDP2.
18 +**Machine:** run coverage sweeps, detect/label hazards, provide confidence
19 +)))
20 +|**Advantages**|(((
21 +* Increased situation awareness for first responder team (due to detailed information (videostream, audio, 3D map, etc.) from the robot.)
22 +* Improved safety for first responders (due to avoiding more hazards due to increased situation awareness of site interior.)
23 +* More effective decision making which resulted in positive outcomes (due to increased situation awareness.)
24 +)))
25 +|**Disadvantages**|(((
26 +* Risk of delay if robots struggle.
27 +* Potentially slower mission completion time due to robot being slower than human or dog.
28 +)))
29 +|**Related TDPs/IDPs**|TDP5, TDP6; IDP2.
1774262190622-968.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.TjallingHaije
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +9.9 KB
Content